more sense in
that case to wait for the longest time possible, not the shortest.
Have I misunderstood the code?
3. I don't understand why it sets an upper limit on the wait time at
all. Is that the only way to support cancellation tokens? If no
cancellation token were provided, would it be better t
ere.
Is this problem specific to my setup? Or does it happen for everyone?
Could it be fixed in libgdiplus?
Regards,
Weeble.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
e a native
library and unsafe code from the equation.
I did discover an email to this list last year[2], in which the
author, Koushik Dutta, discusses what I think is a workaround on
Android to avoid encountering a bug that sounds very similar. He says
that he might try to fix it but that it is
(My messages to the list seem to keep vanishing. This is the third
attempt to send this one. The first two were yesterday and a few hours
ago. Might anyone know why they're not working?)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble wrote:
> I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box
Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble wrote:
> I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running
> Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work on Windows-x86 with
> Microsoft's CLR and on Linux-x86 with Mono, they fail often (but not
> always) with an asse
(Sorry if this goes through twice. I sent it yesterday and it didn't
seem to appear on the list.)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble wrote:
> I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running
> Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work on
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble wrote:
> I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running
> Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work on Windows-x86 with
> Microsoft's CLR and on Linux-x86 with Mono, they fail often (but not
> always) with a
Yikes. Sorry about the multiple posts there. I should have realised
the mail server was just down.
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble wrote:
>> I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running
>> Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work
le
handle/descriptor behaviour?
If there is indeed a good reason not to do that, is 2 feasible? Are
there any traps to watch out for here? Perhaps if there are multiple
AppDomains?
Regards,
Weeble.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@l
ducing new tests against a new API results in build
failures. You can see what I've tried to do here:
https://github.com/weeble/mono/commit/f545596052125b90ebdd0a302fa3473d768f9d52
I'm willing to keep trying at this if anyone is able to give me some
pointers. Does eglib's API already
10 matches
Mail list logo
