Re: [Mono-dev] small footprint mono / AOT

2011-08-24 Thread g...@novadsp.com
Hello Jonathan On 24/08/2011 19:03, Jonathan Shore wrote: Hi, I have somewhat unusual requirements whereby need to have a minimal footprint, native, statically compiled app. (well yes they mostly intersect with embedded applications, but with some further requirements). This application

[Mono-dev] Generating Cocoa bindings through Objective-C introspection?

2011-08-18 Thread g...@novadsp.com
F_script (http://www.fscript.org/) has a rather clever class browser that lists classes, methods etc via the Objective-C runtime. Might it possible to use the same approach to automate the generation of MONO Cocoa bindings using the same technique? The runtime has a C API, is well documented*,

Re: [Mono-dev] Continuous Integration for Mono

2011-07-04 Thread g...@novadsp.com
Hi Rolf On 04/07/2011 11:16, Rolf Bjarne Kvinge wrote: The problem has always been getting enough hardware in all the variations mono supports. So if anybody has any machines or VMs that can run full-time please send me a mail. Have in mind that it’ll be pretty much required to give us

Re: [Mono-dev] Continuous Integration for Mono

2011-07-04 Thread g...@novadsp.com
Hi Rolf On 04/07/2011 13:35, Rolf Bjarne Kvinge wrote: Assuming you're talking about the most normal architectures such as x86/x64, it's not much: 20gb of hard drive (after installing OS) + 1gb of memory (windows 7 bots will likely need more) + internet connection + 4-5 year old cpu. Have in

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono/C# for Apache

2011-06-10 Thread g...@novadsp.com
On 10/06/2011 00:23, Lee Fisher wrote: On 6/9/11 6:34 AM, g...@novadsp.com wrote: Besides mod_haydn (which AFAIK is unmaintained by Sterling), I presume you know about mod_mono, in case the ASP.NET-centric scope of this can help you. Lee, thanks. I'm unsure about the differences in purpose

[Mono-dev] Mono/C# for Apache

2011-06-09 Thread g...@novadsp.com
An exploratory question. There is abandoned code in the Apache source tree which attempted to allow C# to be used to create Apache modules. One of the problems cited by the authors was the Boehm GC used in the Mono runtime, suggesting that the system be built

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono/C# for Apache

2011-06-09 Thread g...@novadsp.com
Okay, I've found them: http://haydn.sourceforge.net/ The issue with this code is: it's calling mono_jit_cleanup on every request. This is suboptimal, buggy and shouldn't be done. Hello Robert, excellent, thanks. Anything else malign that caught your eye? I would sorely like to get Mono and

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono/C# for Apache

2011-06-09 Thread g...@novadsp.com
Super, thanks. If you've got a donation box somewhere please let me know. ATB Jerry. On 09/06/2011 14:53, Robert Jordan wrote: On 09.06.2011 15:34, g...@novadsp.com wrote: Okay, I've found them: http://haydn.sourceforge.net/ The issue with this code is: it's calling mono_jit_cleanup