Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Announce: Mono.Fuse (+ Required Mono.Posix Changes)

2006-08-30 Thread Jonathan Pryor
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 23:12 -0700, Valient Gough wrote: > I've responded separately to Jon because I find his comments inflammatory. The only inflammatory bit was saying that I didn't like the SULF API. Which is about as inflammatory as saying Java collections suck (no language integration like

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Announce: Mono.Fuse (+ Required Mono.Posix Changes)

2006-08-29 Thread Valient Gough
I've responded separately to Jon because I find his comments inflammatory. The SULF project you reference predates the FUSE low-level API and even the latest couple kernel interface revisions. You could have found out about much newer code, and perhaps learned something about FUSE itself through