Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] Replace ENABLE_COREE with a runtime switch.

2011-03-18 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
Does it break the verifier without mixed mode enabled? If it doesn't looks good to me. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Vincent Povirk madewokh...@gmail.comwrote: This patch mostly reverts 666d37829304e85f72969c44e92bc11ca167a272, which put Mono's mixed-mode support in #ifdef ENABLE_COREE,

Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] Replace ENABLE_COREE with a runtime switch.

2011-03-18 Thread Vincent Povirk
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera kump...@gmail.com wrote: Does it break the verifier without mixed mode enabled? If it doesn't looks good to me. That worked in my testing (and failed with mixed mode enabled). ___ Mono-devel-list

Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] Replace ENABLE_COREE with a runtime switch.

2011-03-17 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 14:11 -0600, Vincent Povirk wrote: This patch mostly reverts 666d37829304e85f72969c44e92bc11ca167a272, which put Mono's mixed-mode support in #ifdef ENABLE_COREE, disabling it by default on Windows. It was disabled because it broke the verifier, and it still does.

[Mono-dev] [PATCH] Replace ENABLE_COREE with a runtime switch.

2011-03-07 Thread Vincent Povirk
This patch mostly reverts 666d37829304e85f72969c44e92bc11ca167a272, which put Mono's mixed-mode support in #ifdef ENABLE_COREE, disabling it by default on Windows. It was disabled because it broke the verifier, and it still does. Since most of the new behavior is dependent on whether coree has