Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Brian Crowell
Atsushi Eno wrote: We do support multi AppDomain. Your complaints on bug #76757 is too tiny to be taken care on this general information. Or are you saying that we should say we don't support generics because there are some bugs ? All I know is that I'm tired of patching every copy of Mono I

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Atsushi Eno
You don't understand what I wrote. *Every* bugs could block people. IF we write notes that your code might not work if you use ... with related to *every* bugs (EVEN IF it is possible), that web info becomes pretty useless because of such flood of extraneous information. You could have just

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, Feel free to augment the page with your experiences or with tools, tricks and tips that might be useful to others. Probably add a suggestion to never create more than one AppDomain under Mono. I will add the semantics of our current AppDomain behavior. Miguel.

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Alex Chudnovsky
Miguel de Icaza wrote: I have created a new page on the Wiki to serve as a tutorial to help people who want to port their applications from Windows to Linux to have a central location to look for information, the page is: http://www.mono-project.com/Guidelines:Application_Portability

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, You don't understand what I wrote. *Every* bugs could block people. IF we write notes that your code might not work if you use ... with related to *every* bugs (EVEN IF it is possible), that web info becomes pretty useless because of such flood of extraneous information. You could

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Brian Crowell
Miguel de Icaza wrote: I will add the semantics of our current AppDomain behavior. Thank you. Sorry for the caustic attitude. --Brian ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Brian Crowell
Charlie Poole wrote: Oddly enough, loading our NUnit 2.4 test assemblies under a single domain causes it to fail. We're making it work under Mono by using Multiple AppDomains. So I assume the problem is more subtle than never create more than one I'll be interested in reading what the issues

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Charlie Poole
Hi Brian, Charlie Poole wrote: Oddly enough, loading our NUnit 2.4 test assemblies under a single domain causes it to fail. We're making it work under Mono by using Multiple AppDomains. So I assume the problem is more subtle than never create more than one I'll be interested in

[Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-30 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I have created a new page on the Wiki to serve as a tutorial to help people who want to port their applications from Windows to Linux to have a central location to look for information, the page is: http://www.mono-project.com/Guidelines:Application_Portability Feel free

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-30 Thread Brian Crowell
Miguel de Icaza wrote: Feel free to augment the page with your experiences or with tools, tricks and tips that might be useful to others. Probably add a suggestion to never create more than one AppDomain under Mono. --Brian ___ Mono-devel-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-30 Thread Atsushi Eno
We do support multi AppDomain. Your complaints on bug #76757 is too tiny to be taken care on this general information. Or are you saying that we should say we don't support generics because there are some bugs ? Atsushi Eno Brian Crowell wrote: Miguel de Icaza wrote: Feel free to augment