On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 14:34 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote:
Mirco Bauer wrote:
*cough* lack of const *cough*
I quite don't understand it - unless you think you can declare
const arrays (which is incorrect).
He's saying that the Common Language Specification should have had the
concept of C++
Mirco Bauer wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 20:09 +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
On 11/30/06 Atsushi Eno wrote:
I noticed that many string[] properties in DateTimeFormatInfo are
used directly in DateTime. They have to return Clone() which are
not neccessary there.
If the arrays are exposed to the
On 11/30/06 Atsushi Eno wrote:
I noticed that many string[] properties in DateTimeFormatInfo are
used directly in DateTime. They have to return Clone() which are
not neccessary there.
If the arrays are exposed to the user, we should clone them, otherwise
the user can change the values in the
Hello,
I noticed that many string[] properties in DateTimeFormatInfo are
used directly in DateTime. They have to return Clone() which are
not neccessary there.
using System;
using System.Globalization;
class Test
{
public static void Main ()
{
for (int i