Hi,
As a follow-up to my question about the way in which Mono handles generic
types (see Handling of generics by Mono compiler on January 15), please do
you know whether the distinction being made by Mono between a generic type
and the instance type corresponding to it is only of relevance to the
I just think that if you would query such a thing as list all classes with
a method that returns an integer, the generic class:
public class DoerT {
public T Do() {...}
}
... shouldn't be listed but this instanced version probably should:
public class DoOnInt : Doerint {}
Hope it helps,
Hi Rafael,
Thanks, but if I'm understanding you right, I don't mean the distinction
between an instantiation of the generic type (if that's the right term) and
the generic type, I mean the difference between the constructed version of
the generic type (for accesses from within the generic type)
Hey,
As a follow-up to my question about the way in which Mono handles generic
types (see Handling of generics by Mono compiler on January 15), please
do
you know whether the distinction being made by Mono between a generic type
and the instance type corresponding to it is only of relevance
Hi Marek,
Thanks. The question actually relates to mcs internals because we're using
it as a frontend when extracting information from the source code. Our usual
approach is to be as faithful to the representation used by the compiler as
possible, but in this case it's complicating the queries,
On Feb 6, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Stuart Golodetz stu...@semmle.com wrote:
do you know whether the distinction being made by Mono between a generic type
and the instance type corresponding to it is only of relevance to the
compiler, or does it have real implications for an application-level
