On 5/22/06, Eyal Alaluf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are now in the middle of a rewrite and in this rewrite we are using Cecil and ASM(via IKVM). The version of the converter in the product was written in C++.This is a very similar approach to what I am doing--having Cecil take care of the PE form
Alaluf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Zac Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andreas Nahr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mono Developers
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] JaCIL Project
Hi Eyal,
Are you guys still using Cecil to read the CIL code?
Jb
Eyal Alaluf wrote:
Hi, all.
Just regarding feasibility
owling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Almann T. Goo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andreas Nahr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mono Developers
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] JaCIL Project
This might be off the radar but what about translating internal
members and attribute data?
Zac Bowling <[EMAIL PR
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mono Developers
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] JaCIL Project
This might be off the radar but what about translating internal members and
attribute data?
Zac Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.zacbowling.com/
Almann T. Goo wrote:
On 5/21/06, *Andreas Nahr* <[E
This might be off the radar but what about translating internal members
and attribute data?
Zac Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.zacbowling.com/
Almann T. Goo wrote:
On 5/21/06, Andreas Nahr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The hard part is likely that CIL
has lots of
On 5/21/06, Andreas Nahr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The hard part is likely that CIL has
lots of construcs that Java bytecode does not have. Just to name a few
common/important ones: Generics, Pointers and Pointer arithmetic, unchecked
exceptions, events, delegates, ...Just a note, from
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 09:59 +0200, Andreas Nahr wrote:
> Nice project, however my guess would be that it will be extremely hard
> to translate arbitrary CIL to Java bytecode.
> The hard part is likely that CIL has lots of construcs that Java
> bytecode does not have. Just to name a few common/impor
Nice project, however my guess would be that it
will be extremely hard to translate arbitrary CIL to Java bytecode.
The hard part is likely that CIL has
lots of construcs that Java bytecode does not have. Just to name a few
common/important ones: Generics, Pointers and Pointer arithmetic, un
Hi all,I've just released an early version of JaCIL, a .NET assembly to Java class file byte-code compiler. It leverages Mono.Cecil to deal with the concrete PE file format of assemblies and uses ObjectWeb ASM via
IKVM.NET to deal with the concrete format of Java class files.This release supports
