Re: [Mono-dev] Making File.Copy more atomic/consistent

Sorry, I was messing up the subject ;) - corrected now :) Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:04 AM, LCID Fire > wrote: > So for consistency and to get the actual check more atomic I'd propose > to just delete the first check in System.IO.MonoIO.Co

Re: [Mono-dev] Making File.Copy more atomic/consistent

There are the tests that are part of corlib and System but they might not be enough for your purposes. On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:30 PM, LCID Fire wrote: > Sorry, I was messing up the subject ;) - corrected now :) > > Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:04 AM, LCID Fire >

Re: [Mono-dev] Making File.Copy more atomic/consistent

Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:30 PM, LCID Fire > wrote: > Are there any nunit tests I could run on the copy? > There are the tests that are part of corlib and System but they might > not be enough for your purposes. They are fine - problem is

Re: [Mono-dev] Making File.Copy more atomic/consistent

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:25 AM, LCID Fire wrote: > Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:30 PM, LCID Fire > > wrote: > > Are there any nunit tests I could run on the copy? > > There are the tests that are part of corlib and System but they might >

Re: [Mono-dev] Making File.Copy more atomic/consistent

Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:25 AM, LCID Fire > wrote: The test assemblies are not build by default - so is there a special way to trigger these tests? Since I didn't know anything better I used gnunit2 now. For corlib: cd mcs/class/co

Re: [Mono-dev] Making File.Copy more atomic/consistent

LCID Fire wrote: For a start I defined additional tests for System.IO.File.Copy. Hope the diff format is ok. Following the changelog. >From 1f60a58af04b036425ec2c6fb2aac685f11d55a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:49:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] * class/corlib/System