I thinks 1.2 is ok.I calling it 2.0 would confuse the issue with .net 2.0 support.-- Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui(C++/C# Developer, IT Consultant)http://www.sharique.managefolio.com/
A revolution is about to begin.A world is about to change.And you and me are "the initiator".
On 10/4/06, "Andrés G
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote:
> I agree with Michael. BTW, can we measure approximately, in a
> percentage, the current implementation of the 2.0 profile?
There's always the class status page:
http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/mono-HEAD-vs-fx-2/index.html
Doesn't have a total % compl
Michael Schurter escribió:
> Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>> I would even go as far as saying that we could feel confident that
>> this could be called "Mono 2.0", but 2.0 would have the unfortunate
>> effect of confusing people regarding our .net 2.0 support.
>
> Agreed!
I also agree.
>> So
I'd go for 1.2. Skipping version numbers is a bad idea. So what there has been tons of progress from 1.1, the next release is still an incremental one. My two US pennies, - Matt
On 10/4/06, Michael Schurter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Miguel de Icaza wrote:> I would even go as far as saying th
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> I would even go as far as saying that we could feel confident that
> this could be called "Mono 2.0", but 2.0 would have the unfortunate
> effect of confusing people regarding our .net 2.0 support.
Agreed!
> So am thinking that maybe we could call this "Mono 1.5
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>So am thinking that maybe we could call this "Mono 1.5", or if we
>plan on keeping the even/odd release numbers from the kernel that we
>could call this Mono 1.6 or 1.8
>
v1.5 would get my vote, odd/even IMO is not ver applicable here as
"stable" versions seems to be p
Hi,
I'd agree that calling it 2.0 would confuse the issue with .net 2.0 support
My (unimportant) 2 cents ;p
Martin
On 10/4/06, Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have always been thinking that the next release of Mono would be
> "1.2" which would flag an incremen
Hello,
We have always been thinking that the next release of Mono would be
"1.2" which would flag an incremental update to Mono 1.0, but this is a
relatively large update as it contains a lot of functionality that was
not in Mono 1.0.
I would even go as far as saying that we could feel co
