e specific
> manner (sse1 – 4.2 active).
>
>
>
> My 2c
>
>
> Russell
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rodrigo Kumpera
> *Sent:* 07 November 2008 15:15
> *To:* Christophe Guillon
> *Cc:* mono-devel-li
Guillon
Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono.Simd Acceleration Attributes
Hi Christophe,
2008/11/7 Christophe Guillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thank you for the explanation. It confirms my point and it seems that we
agree.
For the user guide aspect:
>2) the a
Hi Christophe,
2008/11/7 Christophe Guillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thank you for the explanation. It confirms my point and it seems that we
> agree.
>
> For the user guide aspect:
> >2) the attributes on the methods are never inspected by the runtime:
> >they are there to guide the programmers us
Thank you for the explanation. It confirms my point and it seems that we
agree.
For the user guide aspect:
>2) the attributes on the methods are never inspected by the runtime:
>they are there to guide the programmers using Mono.Simd in determining
>what kind of optimizations are usually available
On 11/07/08 Christophe Guillon wrote:
> It seems that as soon as the Mono.Simd primitives have a well defined
> semantic it is not useful to specify which architecture feature is able to
> emulate each of these primitives. I would have expected this to be the
> choice of the virtual execution envir
Hi all,
Looking at the proposal for the Mono.Simd primitives I'm wondering how the
Mono.Simd.Acceleration attributes and the corresponding Mono.Simd.AccelMode
parameters are useful.
Thus I'm wondering what is the rational of having these attributes defined
and used in the definition of the primiti
