Hi Marek,
I don't really like #1, because this TransferRequest is used for rewriting
in most cases. So doing a 302 redirect would be the wrong approach IMO. I
will try #2, because that sounds like what I am looking for.
Nick
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Marek Habersack wrote:
> Nick Berard
Nick Berardi wrote:
> Hi guys,
Hey Nick,
> I looked in to this more and there are a couple issues that popped up
> when trying to implement the following method:
>
> public void TransferRequest(string path, bool preserveForm, string
> method, NameValueCollection headers)
>
> My major hurdle th
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 17:07 -0400, Nick Berardi wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I looked in to this more and there are a couple issues that popped up
> when trying to implement the following method:
>
> public void TransferRequest(string path, bool preserveForm, string
> method, NameValueCollection headers
Hi guys,
I looked in to this more and there are a couple issues that popped up when
trying to implement the following method:
public void TransferRequest(string path, bool preserveForm, string method,
NameValueCollection headers)
My major hurdle that I wasn't able to over come is the following,
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Marek Habersack
> wrote:
>>> Nick Berardi wrote:
>>> But by leaving out these stub API's the Mono project is essentially
>>> forbidding any application that references these API's from running on
>>> their software, even if the application
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Marek Habersack
wrote:
>> Nick Berardi wrote:
>> But by leaving out these stub API's the Mono project is essentially
>> forbidding any application that references these API's from running on
>> their software, even if the application fully supports .NET 2.0 pre and
Nick Berardi wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hey Nick,
> I guess the misunderstanding is coming in the word "trivial". If it
> was truly trivial I would just do it. But what may seem trivial to you,
All I said was that it shouldn't be hard to do, not that it was trivial.
> seems like climbing a mountain t
Hi Marek,
I guess the misunderstanding is coming in the word "trivial". If it
was truly trivial I would just do it. But what may seem trivial to you,
seems like climbing a mountain to me. In ASP.NET from Microsoft there is a
lot native invoke calls that are made to get the transfer request worki
Nick Berardi wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hey Nick,
>
> It is ultimately up to the team to apply or not apply the patch. So I
> support whatever they choose is best for the Mono project.
Well... I'm part of the team... and in charge of ASP.NET... :)
> However I see no reason to wait to add these stub m
Hi Marek,
It is ultimately up to the team to apply or not apply the patch. So I
support whatever they choose is best for the Mono project.
However I see no reason to wait to add these stub method in place. Because
currently any application that relies on either of these API's, get ugly
exceptio
Nick Berardi wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hello,
> I am a little hesitant to to implement this for Mono for the following
> reasons.
>
> /Number 1/ is the description Microsoft provides for it
> "Gets a value that indicates whether the current application is running
> *in the integrated-pipeline mode of
Hi Marek,
I am a little hesitant to to implement this for Mono for the following
reasons.
*Number 1* is the description Microsoft provides for it
"Gets a value that indicates whether the current application is running *in
the integrated-pipeline mode of IIS 7.0*."
*Number 2* is that the key feat
Nick Berardi wrote:
> Hello group,
Hello,
> This is my first time submitting a patch. So if anything I have done is
> out of the norm, please let me know so that I can correct it.
>
> There are two API's related to IIS 7.0 that were added as part of the
> .NET 2.0 SP2 release that I need sup
Hello group,
This is my first time submitting a patch. So if anything I have done is out
of the norm, please let me know so that I can correct it.
There are two API's related to IIS 7.0 that were added as part of the .NET
2.0 SP2 release that I need supported for an Open Source project that I wor
14 matches
Mail list logo
