Hi, I think these are ok. The throw_exception_by_name stuff is obsolete, it was only kept because s390 continued to use it, so it can be completely removed, along with the definition of MONO_ARCH_HAVE_THROW_EXCEPTION_BY_NAME in mini-s390.h/mini-s390x.h.
About exception17, I can't really help with that, maybe unwinding of the stack when an exception is thrown in a finally clause is broken, because the unwinder thinks catcher2 () is called by Main, but it is called by the code generated by mono_arch_get_call_filter (). Zoltan On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Neale Ferguson <nealefergu...@verizon.net>wrote: > Usually I just svn commit my s390/s390x changes to the repository, but it¹s > been awhile since I¹ve committed so I thought it might be "safer" to > publish > them for review first before committing. Only one bit of common code is > affected and that change is trivial; the rest has to do (mainly) with > implementing IMT and fixing some exception handling stuff. I do, however, > continue to fail the exception17 test and would appreciate advice on how to > track this bugger down (it appears that an exception in catcher1 which had > been called by catcher2 is not being caught). > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list