Thanks Jb/Zoltan for such a quick response to this. Since the patch has
already been commited, I'm going to skip entereing it into bugzilla. Let
me know if you think otherwise.
Cheers,
- raf
> It is ok to check in.
>
> On 5/3/06, Jb Evain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> The attached pat
It is ok to check in.
On 5/3/06, Jb Evain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
The attached patch fixes the problem, and makes the error more
consistent with the .net framework.
Is it ok to commit?
Jb
On May 3, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Jb Evain wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On May 3, 2006, at 5:45 AM, Rafae
Hey,
The attached patch fixes the problem, and makes the error more
consistent with the .net framework.
Is it ok to commit?
Jb
field.diff
Description: Binary data
On May 3, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Jb Evain wrote:
Hi Rafael,
On May 3, 2006, at 5:45 AM, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
The testcase att
Hi Rafael,
On May 3, 2006, at 5:45 AM, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
The testcase attached (bar.cs) consistently generates a SIGSEGV on my
fedora core 5 box running mono 1.1.13.4 and 1.1.14 . The code attached
is basically part of a util class that I use to dynamic set fields
in an
object. If you guy
Hey fellas,
The testcase attached (bar.cs) consistently generates a SIGSEGV on my
fedora core 5 box running mono 1.1.13.4 and 1.1.14 . The code attached
is basically part of a util class that I use to dynamic set fields in an
object. If you guys think this is a new issue let me know and I'll file
