Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-08-01 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, My original question was simpler: why is there a heading Using Windows.Forms as a cross-platform API but not one for Using GTK# as a cross-platform API? Clearly there could be lots of reasons to prefer one over the other, but if you want to port an app, it seems like keeping the API

Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Charlie Poole
Hi Miguel, I have created a new page on the Wiki to serve as a tutorial to help people who want to port their applications from Windows to Linux to have a central location to look for information, the page is: http://www.mono-project.com/Guidelines:Application_Portability

Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Felipe Almeida Lessa
Em Seg, 2006-07-31 às 15:21 -0700, Charlie Poole escreveu: 4) Shouldn't there be a section on using GTK# as a cross-platform Gui? I thought SWF/MWF was more portable because it runs out-of-the-box on MS .NET. Am I wrong? -- Felipe. ___

Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Michael Schurter
Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote: Em Seg, 2006-07-31 às 15:21 -0700, Charlie Poole escreveu: 4) Shouldn't there be a section on using GTK# as a cross-platform Gui? I thought SWF/MWF was more portable because it runs out-of-the-box on MS .NET. Am I wrong? Here are my 2 guesses as to why GTK# is

Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Application Portability Guidelines.

2006-07-31 Thread Atsushi Eno
Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote: Em Seg, 2006-07-31 às 15:21 -0700, Charlie Poole escreveu: 4) Shouldn't there be a section on using GTK# as a cross-platform Gui? I thought SWF/MWF was more portable because it runs out-of-the-box on MS .NET. Am I wrong? Your WinForms application will never be