Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Re: Unhandled Exceptions in Mono

2007-08-11 Thread Charlie Poole
Hi Miguel, > > Mono didn't introduce the breaking change in the 2.0 profile. > > Unhandled exceptions can be taken care of by an > > UnhandledExceptionHandler without use of the > element. > > > > Is this by design? Or is it a compatibility bug? > > We discussed this a few years ago, but I d

Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Re: Unhandled Exceptions in Mono

2007-08-07 Thread Miguel de Icaza
> Mono didn't introduce the breaking change in the 2.0 profile. Unhandled > exceptions can be taken care of by an UnhandledExceptionHandler without use > of the element. > > Is this by design? Or is it a compatibility bug? We discussed this a few years ago, but I do not remember what we did abou

Re: [Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Re: Unhandled Exceptions in Mono

2007-08-07 Thread Charlie Poole
Hi Miguel, > > It appears that Mono doesn't honor the > > enabled="1"/> setting in NUnit's config. I process the unhandled > > exception but the app closes anyway. This is the same > behavior I had > > in .NET 2.0 before adding the above setting. > > > > I'm still using 1.2.2 but this would