for integral types.
Greetings
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com
[mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] Im Auftrag von Stuart
Fraser
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. April 2010 00:22
An: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Betreff: [Mono-dev] Simple
I just tried your sample and if you are looking for a quick workaround (for
yourself, not mono) remove the explicit int cast:
int fact = 5;
float[] tList = { 0.95864f, 0.89374f, 0.89092f, 0.89716f,
0.4191f, 0.79782f };
foreach (float val in tList)
On 30.04.2010 00:21, Stuart Fraser wrote:
Mono results:
0.95864 * 5 = 47931
0.89374 * 5 = 44686
0.89092 * 5 = 44545
0.89716 * 5 = 44857
0.4191 * 5 = 20954
0.79782 * 5 = 39890
.Net results :
0.95864 * 5 = 47932
0.89374 * 5 = 44687
0.89092 * 5 = 44546
.
Rolf
-Mensaje original-
De: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-
boun...@lists.ximian.com] En nombre de Stuart Fraser
Enviado el: viernes, 30 de abril de 2010 0:22
Para: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Asunto: [Mono-dev] Simple floating maths problem
-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] Im Auftrag von Rolf Bjarne
Kvinge
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. April 2010 15:22
An: 'Stuart Fraser'; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Betreff: Re: [Mono-dev] Simple floating maths problem
Hi,
Running this modified simple on x86 .NET:
int fact
: 30 April 2010 21:16
To: 'Rolf Bjarne Kvinge'; Stuart Fraser; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: AW: [Mono-dev] Simple floating maths problem
Sorry, somehow I got this wrong.
So in fact I also get the
47931 = 47932 = 47932 for x86 .Net 3.5 (and Mono) and
47932 = 47932 = 47932
HI All,
I'm currently working on some code for HPC benchmarking using a number of
languages and runtimes but am primarily focussing on C#. During my coding I
have come across some inconsistencies between results between calculated in
Mono vs .Net (and C /Java), there may be a number of reasons
