Re: [Mono-dev] Status of ADO.NET 2.0 implementation

2005-10-26 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: We have not spent a lot of time working on this area, do you have some specifics about what is missing? Ok, the first thing ( thinking in that the actual version of the firebird provider for .net 2.0 matches the beta 2 of it ) DbException class should be in the System.Data.Common

[Mono-dev] Status of ADO.NET 2.0 implementation

2005-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello:I was trying ( one or two weeks ago ) to build the 2.0 version of the Firebird provider ( that right now matches Beta 2 of .NET 2.0 ) and wasn't possible.What is the status of ADO.NET 2.0 ?? --Best regardsCarlos Guzmán ÁlvarezVigo-Spain ___

Re: [Mono-dev] Status of ADO.NET 2.0 implementation

2005-10-18 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello: I was trying ( one or two weeks ago ) to build the 2.0 version of the Firebird provider ( that right now matches Beta 2 of .NET 2.0 ) and wasn't possible. What is the status of ADO.NET 2.0 ??

Re: [Mono-dev] Status of ADO.NET 2.0 implementation

2005-10-18 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello Carlos, I was trying ( one or two weeks ago ) to build the 2.0 version of the Firebird provider ( that right now matches Beta 2 of .NET 2.0 ) and wasn't possible. What is the status of ADO.NET 2.0 ?? We have not spent a lot of time working on this area, do you have some specifics

Re: [Mono-dev] Status of ADO.NET 2.0 implementation

2005-10-18 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: We have not spent a lot of time working on this area, do you have some specifics about what is missing? I don't remember the complete list of problems after the build ( and i can't do anew one right now because i have a fresh install of ubuntu 5.10 installed hehe ), but if i