Re: [Mono-dev] The beta version of ADO.NET provider for MaxDB database

2006-08-09 Thread Dmitry Key
Hi Nagappan I filed the bug #79041 (http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79041) Please take into account that attached file is Tar/GZip archive. _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!

Re: [Mono-dev] The beta version of ADO.NET provider for MaxDB database

2006-08-08 Thread Nagappan
Hi Dmitry, Can you please file a bug on the second issue ? Regarding the third one, if you are using the appropriate conversion classes both reading and writing, hope there should not be any issue. Thanks Nagappan Dmitry Key wrote: Hi, Nagappan 1. The preview version of ADO.NET will be

[Mono-dev] The beta version of ADO.NET provider for MaxDB database

2006-08-07 Thread Dmitry Key
Hi! I am currently working on an ADO.Net Provider for MaxDB that is registered in the SourceForge.net (see http://sourceforge.net/projects/maxdbprovider). The binaries are compiled for Net-1.1, Net-2.0 and Mono-1.0. Since the ADO.NET 2.0 is still in the development phase I can not build

Re: [Mono-dev] The beta version of ADO.NET provider for MaxDB database

2006-08-07 Thread Nagappan
Hi Dmitry, 1. The preview version of ADO.NET will be available with Mono 1.2. 2. Can you please give more details regarding the SIGSEGV ? Procedures to reproduce the bug ? 3. For running the general tests in Big Endian should be same as Little Endian hardware. Recently lot of bugs related to Big

Re: [Mono-dev] The beta version of ADO.NET provider for MaxDB database

2006-08-07 Thread Dmitry Key
Hi, Nagappan 1. The preview version of ADO.NET will be available with Mono 1.2. Ok 2. Can you please give more details regarding the SIGSEGV ? Procedures to reproduce the bug ? I try to run test cases which are working perfectly on .Net (see

Re: [Mono-dev] The beta version of ADO.NET provider for MaxDB database

2006-08-07 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I have the following question to the Mono developers: 1) When ADO.NET 2 implementation will be complete? Will it be included in the Mono 1.2? To follow up to what Nagappan already said, the 2.0 profile libraries are not something that will be officially complete for the 1.2 release.