Antonello Provenzano-3 wrote:
Atsushi,
What I wanted to say was that doing a transition from VS.NEt to #D is
a good idea, since they are comparable... :D
Our company is working third year exclusively with #D, and since
SharpDevelop 2.0 the experience is simply great!
It has debugger,
I strongly encourage you to not lie.
SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring.
Atsushi Eno
Antonello Provenzano wrote:
Peter,
SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO)
comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need
(debugger, code
Atsushi,
I strongly encourage you to not lie.
What do you mean? :|
On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly encourage you to not lie.
SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring.
Atsushi Eno
Antonello Provenzano wrote:
Peter,
SharpDevelop is by far the
Oops, I apologize. I misunderstood comparable that you meant
SD is not usable.
Atsushi Eno
Antonello Provenzano wrote:
Atsushi,
I strongly encourage you to not lie.
What do you mean? :|
On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly encourage you to not lie.
Atsushi,
Oops, I apologize. I misunderstood comparable that you meant
SD is not usable.
No problems, but I meant the exact opposite: IMHO #D is one of the
best IDe for developing Mono and .NET code under Windows.
What I wanted to say was that doing a transition from VS.NEt to #D is
a good
Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
policy to attack people talking about SD?
You should check http://icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Features.aspx for
more information.
Radek
I strongly encourage you to not lie.
SharpDevelop does support debugging and
Radek,
Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
policy to attack people talking about SD?
There has been a *huge* misunderstanding: I was speaking of #D in a
good way, saying it is comparable to VS.NET for most of the features
needed by developers, while Atsushi
Nah, what I've originally thought was the quite opposite, as I wrote
that it *does* support debugging and refactoring.
Atsushi Eno
Radek Polak wrote:
Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
policy to attack people talking about SD?
You should check
Hi,
i misunderstood too :-). Sorry for my stupid answer. Have a nice day
Radek
Radek,
Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
policy to attack people talking about SD?
There has been a *huge* misunderstanding: I was speaking of #D in a
good way, saying it is
I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which
IDE I should use?
Thanks,
Peter
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hi,
I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which
IDE I should use?
Try sharpdevel (it's the one MonoDevelop is based on IIRC)
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thanks, Paul, I'll try SharpDevelop.
Paul wrote:
Hi,
I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which
IDE I should use?
Try sharpdevel (it's the one MonoDevelop is based on IIRC)
TTFN
Paul
Peter,
SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO)
comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need
(debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.).
Cheers.
Antonello
On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to start working with
13 matches
Mail list logo
