Re: [Mono-dev] boo-devel packaging

2008-06-18 Thread Miguel de Icaza
So I'll take Boo.NAnt.Tasks.dll and put it in boo-devel. Debian does a split of .dlls and .exes. Should the .exes also be moved to -devel? It depends on what the .exe and the .dll do. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list

Re: [Mono-dev] boo-devel packaging

2008-06-18 Thread Mirco Bauer
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 20:25 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: Hi, I'm planning on making a package split for boo. This came about from banshee depending on boo, which has an assembly that depends on nant, thus pulling in lots of -devel packages. So I'll take Boo.NAnt.Tasks.dll and put it in

Re: [Mono-dev] boo-devel packaging

2008-06-18 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 18.06.2008 um 21:21 schrieb Mirco Bauer: On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 20:25 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: I'm planning on making a package split for boo. This came about from banshee depending on boo, which has an assembly that depends on nant, thus pulling in lots of -devel packages. So I'll

[Mono-dev] boo-devel packaging

2008-06-17 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I'm planning on making a package split for boo. This came about from banshee depending on boo, which has an assembly that depends on nant, thus pulling in lots of -devel packages. So I'll take Boo.NAnt.Tasks.dll and put it in boo-devel. Debian does a split of .dlls and .exes. Should the