Re: [Mono-dev] poor compression with mono 2.6 (Re: mono 2.6+ : Garbage added to BinaryWriter/GZipStream output?)

2010-01-30 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Thu, 28/1/10, Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 03:19 +, > Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > sorry, attached the wrong patch in the previous > e-mail. (ReadStream probably should use NO_FLUSH For > performance as well?). > > > > File the issue as Bug 574597 , since mono 2.

Re: [Mono-dev] poor compression with mono 2.6 (Re: mono 2.6+ : Garbage added to BinaryWriter/GZipStream output?)

2010-01-30 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
sorry, attached the wrong patch in the previous e-mail. (ReadStream probably should use NO_FLUSH For performance as well?). File the issue as Bug 574597 , since mono 2.4 behaves much better (and better than MS .Net), mono 2.6's behavior is probably considered a regression. diff --git a/s

[Mono-dev] poor compression with mono 2.6 (Re: mono 2.6+ : Garbage added to BinaryWriter/GZipStream output?)

2010-01-30 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Hi, I found the source of my problem with the poor GZipStream compression with mono 2.6 - it is r138254, which rewrites the gzipstream implementation: -- Author: gonzalo Date: Tue Jul 21 02:25:00 2009 + 2009-07-20 Gonzalo Paniagua Javier * Makefile.am: r

Re: [Mono-dev] poor compression with mono 2.6 (Re: mono 2.6+ : Garbage added to BinaryWriter/GZipStream output?)

2010-01-27 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 03:19 +, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > sorry, attached the wrong patch in the previous e-mail. (ReadStream probably > should use NO_FLUSH For performance as well?). > > File the issue as Bug 574597 , since mono 2.4 behaves much better (and better > than MS .Net), mono 2.6's be