Hello Michael Hutchinson.
I've been trying to implement a soft debugger for embedded mono. I googled it
several times and only found your answers (on different websites). Your posts
always said the same thing: Develop a debugger add-in to MonoDevelop. I've been
trying to implement that but
Turns out it might be due to Win32 limitations (QueueUserAPC works only if
SleepEx/WaitForMultipleObjectsEx etc... are used), as notify_thread_apc is
never called back.
I can fix that on my own threads. However, finalizer thread should use such
functions as well otherwise it will always hang
I am having trouble with mono soft debugger.
- I embed Mono runtime in my program, and I got MonoDevelop to act as
SoftDebugger client
- Mono soft debugger is loading properly (first breakpoint usually works --
if already set beforehand -- I can see callstacks, etc...)
- As soon as I press F5 --
Just as a small addition, to confirm what I said earlier concerning
situation with additional threads.
After adding 2 threads that don't actually call mono (simply register them
with mono_thread_attach(mono_get_root_domain())), I end up having:
Waiting for 2(4) threads to suspend... which mean 1
Sorry, last small update, if I simply disable the waiting loop
in wait_for_suspend() and make is_suspended() always return TRUE,
breakpoints/tracing work as expected (except maybe playing with other
threads of course).
This seems to confirm there might be some false positive when trying to
detect
Turns out it might be due to Win32 limitations (QueueUserAPC works only if
SleepEx/WaitForMultipleObjectsEx etc... are used), as notify_thread_apc is
never called back.
I can fix that on my own threads. However, finalizer thread should use such
functions as well otherwise it will always hang
Hi there,
On which platforms is the soft debugger supported?
Thanks,
pablo
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
On amd64/x86/arm.
Zoltan
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:10 PM, pablosantosl...@terra.es
pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote:
Hi there,
On which platforms is the soft debugger supported?
Thanks,
pablo
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
on every OS or just Linux?? I know it's on Mac too, we're using it! :-)
On 21/02/2010 23:15, Zoltan Varga wrote:
On amd64/x86/arm.
Zoltan
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:10 PM, pablosantosl...@terra.es
mailto:pablosantosl...@terra.es pablosantosl...@terra.es
Hi,
It is known to work on linux, windows, mac and the iphone.
Zoltan
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:52 PM, pablosantosl...@terra.es
pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote:
on every OS or just Linux?? I know it's on Mac too, we're using it! :-)
On 21/02/2010 23:15, Zoltan Varga
Hi,
Looks ok.
Zoltan
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Jonathan Chambers jonc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
Attached is a patch for supporting the soft debugger on Windows. The
biggest changes IMO are not to the debugger, but to the mono-*
synchronization utilities. The
Hi,
After the announcement last week of the new soft debugger, I have
several questions:
- I understand MD is the primary interface *right now* for the soft
debugger, is it possible to debug a Linux app too?
- Is there any other available interface to use the soft debugger
besides MD?
- As
On 9-Nov-09, at 6:11 PM, pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote:
Hi,
After the announcement last week of the new soft debugger, I have
several questions:
- I understand MD is the primary interface *right now* for the soft
debugger, is it possible to debug a Linux app too?
You mean a native app?
Hi Geoff,
- I understand MD is the primary interface *right now* for the soft
debugger, is it possible to debug a Linux app too?
You mean a native app? No. You mean a mono app on linux? Yes, on x86
and amd64 and arm currently.
I'm only concerned 99.99% of the time about managed code. So
On 9-Nov-09, at 6:33 PM, pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote:
- Is there any other available interface to use the soft debugger
besides MD?
You can create any interface you like on top of the
Mono.Debugger.Soft.dll, MonoDevelop is the interface we support.
Will it make sense to have some sort
15 matches
Mail list logo
