Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
We use ilasm for C toolchain and we were planning to add a few features. Are
we better off waiting for new version?
Am sorry if this was confusing on the web page.
We are not looking to rewrite ilasm, we are only looking to change the
backend engine for it.
Hello,
A month ago I proposed a patch to ilasm to emit local variable information in
the mdb file. The bug (#368178) remained in the 'NEW' status.
In the mean time, I saw that one of the proposals for the GSoC is to rewrite
ilasm.
I was wondering if ilasm is still in active development? Or are
Erven,
The ilasm mantainer now is Ankit Jain, you should ask him about that.
Besides that, the patch looks good and I don't see a reason why not
commiting it.
Rodrigo
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Erven ROHOU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
A month ago I proposed a patch to ilasm to
We use ilasm for C toolchain and we were planning to add a few features. Are
we better off waiting for new version?
Am sorry if this was confusing on the web page.
We are not looking to rewrite ilasm, we are only looking to change the
backend engine for it.
But changing the back-end is
