Re: [Mono-devel-list] Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll gets support for default values for optional parameters

2005-04-21 Thread Ankit Jain
Hi, > Could we possibly cook a similar solution using Cecil, instead of > disassembling and reassembling? Looks like something that is > potentially less-breakable over the time axis. Yup..thats what we wanna do, but Cecil doesnt have write support as of now. I'll try to contribute to write-suppo

Re: [Mono-devel-list] Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll gets support for default values for optional parameters

2005-04-21 Thread Rafael Teixeira
On 4/21/05, Ankit Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > ... > So, the idea is -> dissassemble Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll --> > fixup_with_script --> assemble back. > Writing the script wasnt much of a problem, but it turned out that > monodis and ilasm had *some* bugs cos of which the "roundtrip"

[Mono-devel-list] Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll gets support for default values for optional parameters

2005-04-21 Thread Ankit Jain
Hi, A long known problem with mono for VB.Net developers was that Microsft.VisualBasic.* didn't support default values for optional parameters. The problem has been nicely explained by Jambu at http://www.gnomebangalore.org/?q=node/view/498. I had written about it in my blog about a month back. I