On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:56 +0200, BRUNET Pierre-Marie - stagiaire
wrote:
Hi, I'm french student working on Mono for a University project. I
wonder if Mono launchs a thread for each processor if a multithread C#
program running over Mono.
No. Mono will launch a thread for each
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 06:36 -0400, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
Mono also has a ThreadPool, for which threads are created on-demand.
The ThreadPool supports a maximum of 50 threads/CPU on Linux, 25/CPU on
Windows.
Those numbers are the default, not a maximum.
-Gonzalo
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:56 +0200, BRUNET Pierre-Marie - stagiaire
wrote:
Hi, I'm french student working on Mono for a University project. I
wonder if Mono launchs a thread for each processor if a multithread C#
program running over Mono.
Mono also has a
Is there a reason for replication of such low thread limits from .NET?
It is PITA to change those programmatically
on Windows (non-portable), and I wonder how can same be done on Mono?
The reason, I think, for this is that there shouldn't be too many threads
spawned. Now... if you want to
Thomas Harning Jr. wrote:
Is there a reason for replication of such low thread limits from .NET?
It is PITA to change those programmatically
on Windows (non-portable), and I wonder how can same be done on Mono?
The reason, I think, for this is that there shouldn't be too many threads spawned.
On Thursday 21 April 2005 09:25, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
I found a solution (hack really) to make .NET programmatically change
maximum limit of threads on Windows,
Would you be so kind to share it?
Sunny
--
Get Firefox
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesid=10745t=85
On Thursday 21 April 2005 09:53, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Sunny wrote:
On Thursday 21 April 2005 09:25, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
I found a solution (hack really) to make .NET programmatically change
maximum limit of threads on Windows,
Would you be so kind to share it?
Its here:
Sunny wrote:
On Thursday 21 April 2005 09:53, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Yes, this does not help you when dealing with blocking sockets. So maybe it is
better to implement your own dynamic size pool to handle this. Or, if these
threads stay in blocked state very long, maybe you will find that just
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 16:44 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Sunny wrote:
I understand desire to have maximum compatibility with actual .NET, but
surely having higher limits on number of threads is not something that
would be bad? From what I understand Windows Socket IO uses Completion
Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 16:44 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
I understand desire to have maximum compatibility with actual .NET, but
surely having higher limits on number of threads is not something that
would be bad? From what I understand Windows Socket IO uses
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 20:36 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
From what I understood blocking IO (at least for sockets) is done by
actually using async IO and making artificial wait for its to finish and
then return result, and therefore usage of number of threads should be
as much or higher
Hi, I'm french student working on Mono for a University project. I
wonder if Mono launchs a thread for each processor if a multithread C#
program running over Mono.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
