Hi!
I noticed that MonoDoc-0.6 slabs this to any enum documentation:
Mono Implementation Note:
This type has 2 members that are marked as unfinished.
Is it a bug?, what could be done about it? Should there be filled a bug
report against it?
--
Martin Willemoes Hansen
-
Hello,
> I've posted the here-inlined message, but unfortunately from a
> non-subscribed account (sorry moderators) and is not yet approved. Well,
> please don't check in it yet, I'm working on more properties of the same
> file. When I am done, I'll post it again. In the meanwhile, I hope comment
Hi!
I was wondering if it is posible to reference a enum member in MonoDoc?
Like
If not I could make a bug report.
--
Martin Willemoes Hansen
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website mwh.sysrq.dk
IRC MWH, freenode.net
---
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 22:47, Phil Crosby wrote:
> Hello
>
> I was reading through the glade doc and found a few errors, thought
> I’d submit them. I copied the lines as they appear in the file, so you
> can quickly find/replace or diff them or something.
>
> First, should the link to GNOME.NET do
Hello list,
I have two news for you. The good one is that I've written the documentation
for the property Gtk.Widget.Sensitive. The bad is -sorry Ben- i don't have
aspell, neither a working xmllint neither tidy, because some things in my
box are broken :(
I've diff'ed my file against Widget.xml f
Hello
I was reading through the glade doc and found a few errors,
thought I’d submit them. I copied the lines as they appear in the file,
so you can quickly find/replace or diff them or something.
First, should the link to GNOME.NET docs be broken? http://go-mono.com/tutorial/html/en/gnom
Hello Ben,
> I got the patch for friendly looking overloads working, it is attached.
> Can you please review it? To have it take affect, you need to:
>
> 1. Apply the patch
> 2. Rebuild all ECMA docs
> 3. Rebuild your index
>
> You should then get a display like
> http://users.haw
