On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 23:07, Mike Kestner wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 14:35, Martin Willemoes Hansen wrote:
>
> > It is to be found in CVS, but will probably be accessible from:
> > http://www.go-mono.com/tutorial/html/en/wrapping/clibs.html at some
> > point.
>
> Could you pos
Hello,
> > In the case of Enums, the TODO does not even say what is missing, so
> > that is even more annoying, so I would suggest just removing the TODOs
> > as they seem complete to me.
> IMHO, this is what i think we should do:
>
> Mark classes "missing" only if the *class* is marked MonoTODO:
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 09:39, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> In the case of Enums, the TODO does not even say what is missing, so
> that is even more annoying, so I would suggest just removing the TODOs
> as they seem complete to me.
IMHO, this is what i think we should do:
Mark classes "missing" only if
Hello,
> We have mentioned that here before, that is because there are two
> unfinished methods in System.Enum, and the other enums inherit them.
>
> The same happens with any Exception, as there are two unimplemented
> methods there.
Ok, so the right fix is to complete System.Enum and System.Ex
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 12:56, Martin Willemoes Hansen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering if it is posible to reference a enum member in MonoDoc?
>
> Like
>
> If not I could make a bug report.
Miguel tells me that enums are referenced like Fields, ie.
That solves the mistery about the missing en
Hi!
In MonoDoc-0.6, the methods with parameters do not have a space between
method name and parameter list, but the space is in the parameter list
like:
void foobar( Foo foo);
I think are correct rendering wo
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 13:29, Martin Willemoes Hansen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> During my documentation effort of the Gnome# delegates, I was wondering
> about these delegates:
>
> ReplyCallback
> StringCallback
>
> It seems that they are used by the convenience functions in
> gnome-dialog-util fx:
> GtkW
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 03:45, Ben Maurer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 21:05, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I noticed that MonoDoc-0.6 slabs this to any enum documentation:
> > >
> > > Mono Implementation Note:
> > > This type has 2 members that are marked as unfinished.
> >
Thanks,
I put it into cvs.
John
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 16:47, Phil Crosby wrote:
> Hello
>
> I was reading through the glade doc and found a few errors, thought
> I’d submit them.
___
Mono-docs-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 21:05, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I noticed that MonoDoc-0.6 slabs this to any enum documentation:
> >
> > Mono Implementation Note:
> > This type has 2 members that are marked as unfinished.
>
> This is very strange. I wonder why it shows up, it is defi
Hello,
> I noticed that MonoDoc-0.6 slabs this to any enum documentation:
>
> Mono Implementation Note:
> This type has 2 members that are marked as unfinished.
This is very strange. I wonder why it shows up, it is definitely a bug.
___
Mono-
11 matches
Mail list logo
