Hello,
I don't see that this needs to be the case. What if we injected the text
this method is only subbed out in Mono's documentation. Help us out!
in msdn pages. The fact that we don't get alot of contributions suggests
one of two things: 1) we don't have many users because they don't find
Issue officially settled then :-)
- raf
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 02:57 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hello,
I don't see that this needs to be the case. What if we injected the text
this method is only subbed out in Mono's documentation. Help us out!
in msdn pages. The fact that we don't
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:32 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hello,
IMHO, this is a silly argument. First, we should not give our users
stubs for documentation because they might fill in the stubs. Second, if
a user is inspired to fill in the stubs, the first thing he is going to
need to
Hello,
2005/9/24, Ben Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
get some idea of what it does. So why not make this process easier, by
providing them a usable interface (IE, a treeview that doesn't suck in
firefox)?
The reason are what Joshua already said. If the user has a great doc
(msdn) at hand, they will
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 11:25 +0200, Mario Sopena wrote:
2005/9/24, Ben Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
get some idea of what it does. So why not make this process easier, by
providing them a usable interface (IE, a treeview that doesn't suck in
firefox)?
The reason are what Joshua already said.
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 11:42 -0400, Ben Maurer wrote:
I'd also like to remind you that most monodoc users (I'd guess upwards
of 90%) do not contribute to the documentation, and there is almost
nothing we can do to get them to do so (except maybe a bribe^Wcontest).
not including a way to get
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 16:53 +0200, Mario Sopena wrote:
2005/9/16, Rafael Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
yeah I see your point of view. But not having the documentation there
can also just lead to the user popping a browser and going to msdn
anyways, and by doing that he/she cannot add value to
