Hey guys,
Ok, from the replies I got, it seems like the updater is not to be
trusted to do this large change. I will talk to Duncan about this, and
see if we can run this against the finalized mscorlib at least to
document what is missing.
miguel
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 21:14 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
>I have been in a bit of disconnect on how to update the documentation
> xml files. There are various pieces in mscorlib that require updates,
> and I would like to get those updated.
>
> miguel
>
Ben Maurer wrote:
Yep, we have talked about this before. jluke said that we would loose
alot of the ECMA docs by doing this.
Why is that?
My recollection of the updater program was that it was pretty flakey.
It shouldn't be hard to write a new program to bring the xml files up to
date, though -
Hey Miggy,
Yep, we have talked about this before. jluke said that we would loose
alot of the ECMA docs by doing this. However, as I have expressed
before, I think that the risk of loosing docs that we can copy/paste is
much smaller than the problem of *not* having alot of api docs. It is
really ha
Hello folks,
I have been in a bit of disconnect on how to update the documentation
xml files. There are various pieces in mscorlib that require updates,
and I would like to get those updated.
miguel
___
Mono-docs-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
