El dom, 24-08-2003 a las 07:12, Ben Maurer escribió:
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 00:01, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > Someone asked in #mono if they could use monodoc without X/Gtk
> > > installed. Since we have monodoc.dll now I made a quick change to allow
> > > mod to work without br
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 00:01, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Someone asked in #mono if they could use monodoc without X/Gtk
> > installed. Since we have monodoc.dll now I made a quick change to allow
> > mod to work without browser.exe
> >
> > Maybe a ./configure --without-X, or similar is
Hello,
> Someone asked in #mono if they could use monodoc without X/Gtk
> installed. Since we have monodoc.dll now I made a quick change to allow
> mod to work without browser.exe
>
> Maybe a ./configure --without-X, or similar is also needed?
The patch attached looks good.
I don't think we ev
Hello,
> Maybe a ./configure --without-X, or similar is also needed?
Am of course willing to reconsider my position if we get a flood of
people asking for this feature, but it seems to be a relatively non-used
setup.
>
> John
--
Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
Someone asked in #mono if they could use monodoc without X/Gtk
installed. Since we have monodoc.dll now I made a quick change to allow
mod to work without browser.exe
Maybe a ./configure --without-X, or similar is also needed?
John
Index: mod.cs
==
