On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 00:03, Peter Williams wrote:
> It's an Outlook virus of some kind. There are many possible places it
> could have come from (forged return address...) so I don't think Miguel
> is secretly using a compromised Windows machine or anything. Just delete
> it.
It looks like the in
Hi,
Just wanted to mention that I added a "testcorlib" target to the
makefile(s) in the mcs module.
Now you can do a 'make testcorlib' to run the unit tests for corlib
only. It's a bit faster, and the results don't scroll up as the other
tests run afterwards.
Enjoy
--
Nick D
Hi,
Just wanted to mention that I added a "testcorlib" target to the
makefile(s) in the mcs module.
Now you can do a 'make testcorlib' to run the unit tests for corlib
only. It's a bit faster, and the results don't scroll up as the other
tests run afterwards.
Enjoy
--
Nick D
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 00:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anybody tell me what is the mail with the subject "Page is loading"?
> I received that and I saw that it is a "¿virus?" (really it is an exe
> file encapsulated inside an audio file)...
It's an Outlook virus of some kind. Ther
Congratulations! Very nice.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 11. februar 2003 18:56
Til: Steinar Herland
Kopi: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Simon Waite; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SV: [Mono-list] Automake: System.Data.OracleClient
Okay, I managed to
Hello,
Can anybody tell me what is the mail with the subject "Page is loading"?
I received that and I saw that it is a "¿virus?" (really it is an exe
file encapsulated inside an audio file)...
Good, that's all for now. See you later,
Pedro
--
Pedro Martinez Juliá
\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)|
Hi all!
It's a great pleasure to say that Npgsql 0.4 development release is out!
>From README:
WHAT'S IT?
==
Npgsql (http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/npgsql/projdisplay.php) is a
.Net Data Provider for PostgreSQL(http://www.postgresql.org). It allows you to
connect to PostgreSQL
* De: Pablo Baena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-11 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: [Mono-list] Patents are coming... ]
> I don't think this will be negative at all. No matter what Perens said,
> a Microsoft bad move in this respect would simply undermine all their
> efforts to promote .NET, the ope
Okay, I managed to get the calls to OCIEnvCreate, and OCIHandleAlloc
to work! This is pretty exciting, because I had begun to wonder how
to pass data between the OCI managed code and the OCI glue unmanaged
code anyway.
Later on, when I can actually access the database from here, I'll
see if I can
Can you comment this one? Looks like MS is applying some patents to .NET.
Do you know more?
Hmm... interesting.
An other article you can find at The Register:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/29283.html
Greatings
BL-Freddy
I just tried to do it myself on Linux and got an error in OCIEnvCreate.
If you know anything about Oracle, can you verify that
[DllImport ("clntsh")]
public static extern int OCIEnvCreate (out IntPtr envhpp,
uint mode, IntPtr ctxp, IntPtr malocfp, IntPtr ralocfp,
IntPtr mfreep, i
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> I was beginning to look into implementing
>
> public object Deserialize (TextReader textReader)
>
> (and other related methods)
>
> but I was wondering if there were some good reasons why this hasn't been
> implemented yet, before I spent too much time looking at it.
>
> Best re
El lun, 10 de 02 de 2003 a las 07:15, Peter Williams escribió:
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 22:49, Nick Drochak wrote:
> > Right now that is crashing on linux, but it did work about a week+ ago.
> >
>
> I just had an inspiration as to how to track this down and fix it. The
> attached patch makes NUnit
Well, it might be possible to do it using the OCI without any glue
at all. In fact, that would be the preferred situation. Daniel
had a heck of a time trying to get the marshalling to work properly with
it. I think it should be feasible. I don't know a lot about marshalling,
but interop gurus c
Hi,
I was beginning to look into implementing
public object Deserialize (TextReader textReader)
(and other related methods)
but I was wondering if there were some good reasons why this hasn't been
implemented yet, before I spent too much time looking at it.
Best regards,
-elan
__
El mar, 11 de 02 de 2003 a las 14:22, kojoadams escribió:
> Hi all,
> Is there any hope of installing mono with gc support if you do not have
> root access? The build scripts look in /usr/include for the gc header files
> before they try to install, and since I do not have root access I can not
Hi all,
Is there any hope of installing mono with gc support if you do not have
root access? The build scripts look in /usr/include for the gc header files
before they try to install, and since I do not have root access I can not
install the gc files there
kojo
Well this plug-in IS very odd...
You have to create a empty project (folder), and then you add C# files using
File/New/Other... that opens a Dialog with a tree containing a C# node, that
gives just a 'C# File' option, that brings a two-step wizard.
You create individual files in that way and th
hello,
i just wanted to inform you guys that we're trying to spread
info about Mono in foreign land ;-D
there is new site available about the project:
http://go-mono.pl/ (in Polish only).
i hope it's ok to send info here, since some Polish dudes may
read this list. we invite you to help us to deve
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 05:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy folks,
>
> I picked up where Daniel Morgan left off with the Mono OracleClient,
> and this client uses a "glue" library to connect the managed provider
> with the unmanaged Oracle call interface (OCI). This is written in
> C. Daniel h
No, it uses oci.
Brgds, Steinar
Copied from
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=no&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=0bd501c
279d2%24c9530730%2495e62ecf%40tkmsftngxs02
I'm getting the same OCIEnvCreate returned -1 Error on
call to Open() & have yet to find a solution.
Any help would be appreciated.
T
Probably it uses the ODBC Drivers which I see are installed already
in ODBC Manager.
Regards,
Simon
- Original Message -
From: "Steinar Herland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:38 AM
Subject: SV: [Mono-list] Automake
I don't think this will be negative at all. No matter what Perens said, a Microsoft bad move in this respect would simply undermine all their efforts to promote .NET, the open source crowd will simply move on to use other technologies (I know I would, .NET has some really nice stuff, but nothin
23 matches
Mail list logo
