Hello!
> On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 20:29, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am using the first attached XSLT in the Mono documentation
> > browser, but it is not handling a couple of entries:...
>
> This should do the trick, I think.
This is great Peter! It does the trick indeed.
Mi
Hello Alan,
I have applied this patch to cvs.
Cheers,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Alan Tam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:56 PM
To: ville
Cc: Daniel Morgan
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Patch - First implementation to DataRelation
Dear ville,
Please apply
Hello Alan,
Your patch has been committed to cvs.
Cheers,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Alan Tam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:37 PM
To: ville
Cc: Daniel Morgan
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Patch - First implementation to DataRelation
I don't know why the l
you may use ArrayList (From System.Collections)
Juan C. Olivares
- Original Message -
From: "Santiago Erquicia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:49 AM
Subject: [Mono-list] compile problem and indexer resizing
> I'm new to C# and programin
Don't know about the compiler complaining, but you should look into using an ArrayList
(System.Collections) instead of a regular array.
-Original Message-
From: Santiago Erquicia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mono-list]
I'm new to C# and programing in general. I was trying to resize an indexer
(by the way, does anybody know how to do that?) and when I tried to compile
it, my CPU usage jumped to 98% and never ended.
This is the code:
class AccountList
{
private Account[] myAccou
Hi.
I'd like to suggest changing the subject line of the bugs-list to
include the status of the bug. Usually I am scanning for resolved bugs
to test out, etc. For my purposes I care less about the priority.
Perhaps status can be added to the subject, or even replace the priority
if that field i
The see is a quick and dirty fix, but the example was very easy
-Original Message-
From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 12:30 PM
To: Jorge Pérez "Burgos (Koke)
Cc: Peter Williams; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mono-list] More help needed with XSLT.
Hi Miguel,
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 20:29, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am using the first attached XSLT in the Mono documentation
> browser, but it is not handling a couple of entries:...
This should do the trick, I think.
Peter
--
Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROT
Hello!
> Fixed in CVS. It was a problem with ObjectManager.
>
> BTW, as suggested by Patrik, it fails on MS.NET :-)
hehehe, that is prety funny ;-)
Miguel
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Hello!
I am using the first attached XSLT in the Mono documentation
browser, but it is not handling a couple of entries:
This should be rendered in :
Should be rendered as:
Could someone help me?
Miguel
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transf
Fixed in CVS. It was a problem with ObjectManager.
BTW, as suggested by Patrik, it fails on MS.NET :-)
Lluis.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mono-list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:41 PM
Subject: [Mono-list] About Serialization
>
> Hello,
Hi,
Can you test the code on MS platform also? I had a lot of issues with array
serialization on MS platform to..
Cheers,
Patrik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:42 PM
To: mono-list
Subject: [Mono-list] About Seria
Hello,
I was testing some stuff with BinaryFormatter and saw that there is a
problem when I serialize an array of structs of objects... something
like this:
[Serializable]
public class A {
string s;
public A (string s) { this.s = s; }
}
[Serializable]
public struct B {
p
tryed to run mbas under linux
got this answer :\
[root@mctm mctm]# mbas
bash: mbas: command not found
file does not exist
i've installed the rpm
How can i get mbas?
shouldn't it be in the rpm pack?
thx!
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PRO
El lun, 17 de 02 de 2003 a las 19:40, Deepak escribió:
> Unhandled Exception: System.NotImplementedException:
> The requested feature is not yet implemented
> in <0x0002f> 00 System.Xml.Xsl.XslTransform:Transform
XslTransform is a post mono 0.19 addition. You need a snapshot or
building mcs and mo
Hi,
I recently downloaded the Monodoc archive and tried
using it. I seem to have some problems with it.
Whenever I try to click on a class to view its
definitions such as methods etc. the application quits
saying the following,
[deepak@localhost]# mono browser.exe
Variable Font: "Sans 10"
Variab
Proposed ChangeLog:
* DataRelation.cs: Added storage required to hold the relations.
Checking of constraints are not implemented yet. Extended properties and events
not ready yet.
* DataRelationCollection.cs: Implemented DataSetRelationCollection and
DataTableRelationCollection, bot
On 02/18/03 Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > If you're willing to do the preprocessing, you can just use an ahead of
> > time compiler: that will reduce the jit processing time much more than
> > optimizing just the IL code.
>
> Yes, but that sacrifices portability of the binary.
You still can use the
On 17-Feb-2003, Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/17/03 Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > There are lots of other optimizations which can be done at the IL->IL
> > level, many of which *do* require lots of processing time. To avoid
> > duplicating these optimizations in multiple language f
On 02/17/03 Fergus Henderson wrote:
> There are lots of other optimizations which can be done at the IL->IL
> level, many of which *do* require lots of processing time. To avoid
> duplicating these optimizations in multiple language front-ends, it makes
> sense to have an IL->IL optimization tool.
On 17-Feb-2003, Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/17/03 Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > On 17-Feb-2003, Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Detecting tail-recursion is easy and performing tail recursion
> > > elimination should not be difficult in the new JIT, maybe one of these
On 02/17/03 Fergus Henderson wrote:
> On 17-Feb-2003, Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Detecting tail-recursion is easy and performing tail recursion
> > elimination should not be difficult in the new JIT, maybe one of these
> > days I'll have a look at doing it, but it's not an high pri
On 17-Feb-2003, Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detecting tail-recursion is easy and performing tail recursion
> elimination should not be difficult in the new JIT, maybe one of these
> days I'll have a look at doing it, but it's not an high priority
> for me right now.
It might be bette
On 02/16/03 Christian.Buchner wrote:
> Now it appears to load my own J# compiled assembly just fine.
> The example is a simple J# application, performing only a simple
>
> System.out.println("Hello World!\n");
>
>
> However Microsoft's assemblies (vjs*.dll) won't load still. *sigh*
>
> 02/16/
On 02/16/03 Marcus wrote:
> Yesterday Jeroen Frijters posted an array creation test, where mono did
> particularly badly. I am wondering if mono's uncharacteristically poor
> performance on that test is caused by a more general problem with highly
> recursive functions.
As I told you on IRC, th
I just noticed that DataSetRelationCollection and DataTableRelationCollection
is an internal inner class inside abstract class DataRelationCollection.
However it is NOT present in any form in MS .NET Framework docs.
I've searched through the ChangeLog and seems it has been controversial over
ages,
Hello,
Just in case you don't pay attention to the cvs commits. Tim Coleman got
the Oracle ADO.NET provider (System.Data.OracleClient) to retrieve data from
an Oracle 8i database. In current cvs Mono, you can only retrieve simple
character data.
For example, this example SQL works with the samp
28 matches
Mail list logo
