Hi,
first you need to create a Project using Monodevlop. After new Assemblies can
be added at the References of the project. Just do a right-click on the
References Entry in the Tree under the Solution Tab. The new window allows
you to add the Reference you need to run your app.
Kind Regards,
Hi Dmitry,
Can you please file a bug on the second issue ? Regarding the third one,
if you are using the appropriate conversion classes both reading and
writing, hope there should not be any issue.
Thanks
Nagappan
Dmitry Key wrote:
Hi, Nagappan
1. The preview version of ADO.NET will be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-devel-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno
Sent: maandag 7 augustus 2006 3:58
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: [Mono-dev] local file based EventLog implementation
Hi,
During a consultation with a
Hello.
I have done a small proof of concept of Remoting and found out that it
works as a connection-made-by-demand. I thought that the MarshalRefByObj
worked using always the same connection.
Is there a way to use only a connection (with a somewhat keep-alive
behaviour) between the client and
Ympostor wrote:
Hello.
I have done a small proof of concept of Remoting and found out that it
works as a connection-made-by-demand. I thought that the MarshalRefByObj
worked using always the same connection.
Is there a way to use only a connection (with a somewhat keep-alive
Ympostor wrote:
Ympostor wrote:
Hello.
I have done a small proof of concept of Remoting and found out that it
works as a connection-made-by-demand. I thought that the MarshalRefByObj
worked using always the same connection.
Is there a way to use only a connection (with a somewhat
Ympostor wrote:
Is there a way to use only a connection (with a somewhat keep-alive
behaviour) between the client and the server so as to allow to bypass
any firewalls (that prevent incoming connections, like NAT) that may
affect the client?
Hi Gert,
Thanks for the comments.
Gert Driesen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-devel-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno
Sent: maandag 7 augustus 2006 3:58
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: [Mono-dev] local file based
Hi,
There is an event logging API on Windows and in fact it's better to use it
than writing events directly to the registry:
http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684073.aspx
Note that there is another topic in this documentation tree called Windows
Event Log that requires
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-devel-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornél Pál
Sent: dinsdag 8 augustus 2006 20:03
To: Atsushi Eno; Gert Driesen
Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] local file based EventLog implementation
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-devel-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno
Sent: dinsdag 8 augustus 2006 19:47
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] local file based EventLog implementation
Hi Gert,
Thanks for the info Robert! I continue inline...
Robert Jordan wrote:
Ympostor wrote:
Ympostor wrote:
Hello.
I have done a small proof of concept of Remoting and found out that it
works as a connection-made-by-demand. I thought that the MarshalRefByObj
worked using always the same
You are right, events are not stored in registry:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315417/
And the source has to be added using registry API:
http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684029.aspx
http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684083.aspx
And there is another
Hey,
Ympostor wrote:
However, in case you're interested, now I am investigating this one
(which I haven't managed to make it work yet but I suspect the reason
is that I am running it with 2.0 Framework and I should use 1.1 or
update the sources...):
The MS.NET 2.0 remoting stack is pretty
Brian Crowell wrote:
Ympostor wrote:
Is there a way to use only a connection (with a somewhat keep-alive
behaviour) between the client and the server so as to allow to bypass
any firewalls (that prevent incoming connections, like NAT) that may
affect the client?
Ympostor wrote:
Are you referring to any of the tecniques that are being used by the
solutions that Robert and I have mentioned?
Yes, they look like they do pretty much what I said.
I don't want to deal with Sockets. I am trying to use Remoting so as to
avoid the implementation of the
Hello,
I'm not sure if it's really necessary to have a separate
EventLogFactory abstraction, we could use a similar approach to the
one used for the Registry API; meaning, define an interface and
implementations of that interface and have EventLog pick the
implementation for doing all the
Hello,
Kornél Pál wrote:
You are right, events are not stored in registry:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315417/
And the source has to be added using registry API:
http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684029.aspx
I was using resgen2 to convert a StringBuilder.resources from the
SharpDevelop sources to a resx file. It failed as illustrated below:
C:\Program Files\SharpDevelop\2.0\data\templates\project\CSharpresgen2
DefaultResources.resources DefaultResources.resx
Error: Object reference not set to an
Hi,
I've rewritten the spec file for db4o to now add the db4o.dll to gac (I
can't add db4o-tools.dll as it's not a strong name). I've used the
following for the gacutil line
gacutil -i dll/db4o.dll -f -package db4o -root %{buildroot}%{monodir}
This adds the dll to (what becomes) /usr/lib
When
David Abrames wrote:
I have the following structure in Windows:
typedef struct {
BYTE FAR *myBtyeArray;
} MYSTRUCTURE;
In .NET this structure is defined like this:
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, Size = 4, Pack = 1)]
public class MYSTRUCTURE {
public byte[] myByteArray;
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:11 +0100, PFJ wrote:
I've rewritten the spec file for db4o to now add the db4o.dll to gac
snip/
The problem comes when I try to link to db4o. All I get back is that the
db4o assembly cannot be found. I'm using
mcs db4oexample.cs -r:db4o.dll (I've also tried Db4o.dll
Hello all,
I have a webservice running in my machine who accessa a database and
return one date.
When i get data from test form, i get this value (from database):
1984-08-08T10:35:15.9147790-02:00 as DateTime
then i assign to a variable with:
DateTime birth = (DateTime) row[table_in_database]
Hi,
1984-08-08T10:35:15.9147790-02:00 contains time zone as well so
07/08/1984 can be the same date in a different time zone. You should have
a deeper look at the issue because there is a database involved as well so
it's quite difficult to tract the problem without access to the database.
Cool. Well it was just something i thought about, and figured i'd share... and yeah, its probably like you say. More appliable on windows. Anyways, thanks for the answer./N
On 7/13/06, Terry L. Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting idea, but not necessarily in the way you meant it. The
Miguel,Thanks for you quick response, I'll dig into it and try to contact Matjaz.If anyone else can give me some tips about gtk and databinding please post your experiences.Jeroen
On 8/7/06, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, My Question: Should I implement my own bindings, if so how
26 matches
Mail list logo
