Hello,
Are you using latest svn for vbnc? A few optimization was committed this
week so it should be faster. If it is running out of memory though I think
there might some other problem optimizations won't resolve.
Rolf
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:21:07 +0100, Kornél Pál [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached patch implements
1) DirectoryInfo.GetDirectories with SearchOption.AllDirectories
2) NameValueConfigurationCollection.Properties
this facilitates implementation of WWF configuration properties like:
On 10/26/06 Atsushi Eno wrote:
Well, the point of the Ben's question is, compacting GC is likely to
store array in nursery area (likely, since it could be regarded too
big to store in nursery area), so nursery allocation and releasing
might become faster than fixing string pointer which might
On 10/26/06 Krishna Ganugapati wrote:
I'm trying to compile Mono on 64 bit ppc SLES9 - I can build glib2,
libgdiplus, but when I configure mono, I get the following error
checking if inter-process shared handles are requested... yes
configure: error: No JIT or interpreter support available
IBM has offering for free remote access to Power5 hardware:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-openpower1/index.
html
So, this seems to be a solution for hardware access problem. The need
for spare time is still here. :(
I hope, this message does not breaks maillist rules,
Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed around
with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional operating
system development to learn a little more.
I envision an operating system where applications and shared libraries are
first-class citizens. Meaning,
It is indeed a very interesting concept
Surely the main limiting factor will be that the runtime is never
going to be as fast as unmanaged C for low level tasks such as
file/memory management...
Martin
On 10/30/06, jmacdonagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad to see I'm not the only one
Although there is a lot of overhead to start up a managed executable, I'm
sure unsafe pointer operations are just as fast as their C counterparts.
Martin Hinks wrote:
It is indeed a very interesting concept
Surely the main limiting factor will be that the runtime is never
going to be
I suppose the overhead shouldn't be enormous on unsafe ops - except
that the runtime is still consuming background resources and, as you
say, startup times are increased.
On 10/30/06, Johann MacDonagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although there is a lot of overhead to start up a managed
Meaning, what language or runtime environment would my
operating system consider first-class. I could choose C/C++, but that locks
people into a language. Instead, I could choose IL, which can be generated
by any number of languages.
This one's a pretty empty point. You wouldn't actually be
I get:
[mcs/class/System.XML/System.Xml.XPath/Tokenizer.cs, Line=51, Column=29,
Type=Error, Description=The type or namespace name `yyParser' could not
be found. Are you missing a using directive or an assembly
reference?(CS0246)
Any hints on how I can compile this?
Thanks in advance,
jmacdonagh wrote:
Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed around
with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional operating
system development to learn a little more.
What interests me most about this is a C# program as a first-class citizen, or
really,
Brian Crowell wrote:
What interests me most about this is a C# program as a first-class
citizen, or really, every API in the system being not only available, but
*designed for* managed programs.
Right. I dislike how current mainstream operating systems regard executables
as just another
Levi Bard wrote:
Meaning, what language or runtime environment would my
operating system consider first-class. I could choose C/C++, but that
locks
people into a language. Instead, I could choose IL, which can be
generated
by any number of languages.
This one's a pretty empty point.
With MD, the only way you can really build mcs classes is to open
Makefile in MD.
.csproj is obviously unused one. Just removed.
Atsushi Eno
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote:
I get:
[mcs/class/System.XML/System.Xml.XPath/Tokenizer.cs, Line=51, Column=29,
Type=Error, Description=The
Brian Crowell wrote:
jmacdonagh wrote:
Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed
around with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional
operating system development to learn a little more.
What interests me most about this is a C# program as a
Hello,
The attached patch implements
1) DirectoryInfo.GetDirectories with SearchOption.AllDirectories
2) NameValueConfigurationCollection.Properties
this facilitates implementation of WWF configuration properties like:
I noticed some typo's in the FtpStatusCode enum in the System.Net namespace.
The word available is miss spelled as avalaible.
I created two patches to fix this issue.
The first removes the miss spelled words and adds the correct spelling,
the second patch only adds the correct spelled words but
I'd vote for the first one, if mono compiles correctly with it. If
not, you'd have to patch also the places where it was used.
On 10/30/06, Jensen Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed some typo's in the FtpStatusCode enum in the System.Net namespace.
The word available is miss spelled as
sorry, what is the main idea??, develop a operating system in C#, sorry
I lost the first post.
If that is the case, I have a prototype OS in C# (for educational
pospuses only), offcourse is very, very, very basic, for the moment only
open one or more proto-assembler files (like compiled
Patch number 2.
Added support for CacheEntryNotFound, RequestProhibitedByCachePolicy
and RequestProhibitedByProxy in the WebExceptionStatus.cs enum in the
System.Net namespace.
Regards,
Jensen
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog
Michael Schurter wrote:
Brian Crowell wrote:
jmacdonagh wrote:
Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed
around with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional
operating system development to learn a little more.
What interests me most about this
I would love to see what you have accomplished so far. What portion of what
you mentioned is in C#?
Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
sorry, what is the main idea??, develop a operating system in C#, sorry
I lost the first post.
If that is the case, I have a prototype OS in C# (for educational
...tell me if you have problems with the rar attached files...
Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
all that I mention is in C#, please keep in mind that is a probe of
concepts test code, is not a serious effor as the proposed in this
thread, I love to work on this proyect, I know about assembler on
Hi, Mauricio and Brian! To everyone else -- I'm sending this to the entire
list so that people that might be interested in see there's more interest.
I'm interested in the managed OS idea. I've written some thoughts about this
some time ago, just search for my thoughts through the archive.
I would like to conjecture that a good MSIL - native compiler work make the
C# memory management code execute at the same speed as compiled C code.
After all, C code gets converted to an intermediate language too, as part of
the compilation. Both methods express the same computations, so it should
Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
all that I mention is in C#, please keep in mind that is a probe of
concepts test code, is not a serious effor as the proposed in this
thread, I love to work on this proyect, I know about assembler on
windows, linux and a little IL, I also know a lote of OSs
So does anyone have any problems with calling this project SharpOS? If not,
I'll register www.sharpos.org right now and set up a wiki.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Mono-devel-list--Operating-System-in-C--Project-tf2349909.html#a7087087
Sent from the Mono - Dev
Johann MacDonagh wrote:
Actually if it's all the same, I'd like to keep this operating system
separate from the Unix mentality. That's not to say we wouldn't borrow some
of Unix's ways of doing things, but there are certain things that would need
to be changed.
There are lots of things to
...try from here:
http://mhenriquez.no-ip.com/descargas/
but please move the kernel.rar file to other place when you can access,
is a very unestable server...sorry
...at least is an object oriented kernel emulator.
Mauricio
Brian Crowell wrote:
Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
all that I
Two issues come to mind:
1) C# and J# are registered by Microsoft. Let's make sure the # can't cause
trouble :)
2) You don't know if this'll work or tank, so I suggest using sf.net, and
getting free project hosting from them, at least for a while.
Either way, please let us know how this is
True. But there are projects such as SharpDevelop who haven't been harrassed
yet.
SF doesn't offer a Wiki do they? For the initial brainstorming of this
project, a wiki would work great.
Victor Costan wrote:
Two issues come to mind:
1) C# and J# are registered by Microsoft. Let's make
I did a little research and it looks like it is possible to install MediaWiki, although it can be painful at times.
Anyway, Michael Schurter contacted me and said that he has some space
on his hosting account. He is going to register www.sharpos.org and set
up MediaWiki. We can better communicate
Johann MacDonagh wrote:
I did a little research and it looks like it is possible to install
MediaWiki, although it can be painful at times.
You could go the Google Project Hosting route. They offer Subversion hosting
and their own (primitive) issue tracking service:
Johann MacDonagh wrote:
SF doesn't offer a Wiki do they? For the initial brainstorming of this
project, a wiki would work great.
If I'm reading the Sourceforge docs right, you should be able to install a
PHP-based wiki (such as MediaWiki) without too much trouble:
Since the idea of a managed operating system has been discussed at
length on the mono-devel-list, I went ahead and registered sharpos.org!
I encourage anyone interested in developing a managed operating system
to visit http://sharpos.org
Please start editing the wiki and sign up for the
Aww, I let the thread go for a bit and it's packed!
I have expressed support for the managed kernel idea because I am
already in the process of building a managed operating system. I call
it Jeto. Currently it consists of...
- A GNU/Linux distribution with a new filesystem layout
- A foundation
Related to Microsoft's C# and .NET trademarks:
I have been referring to .NET as the Common Language Infrastructure,
but C#... well C# is really it's name. Would it be better to call it
ECMA-335 :)?
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
William Lahti wrote:
I have expressed support for the managed kernel idea because I am
already in the process of building a managed operating system. I call
it Jeto. Currently it consists of...
That figures. We've already drafted budgets and purchased an office.
Kidding, kidding. Sort of. Mr.
Aye, I'm on the list now. Just have to set up a label for it. I'll
post code and more info about Jeto on a new page in the wiki so it can
be considered. This project looks like some fun.
On 10/31/06, Brian Crowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Lahti wrote:
I have expressed support for the
Sun Microsystem plan to open the source of Java core in the next 30-60 days. Is
it possible to create interface between Mono and Java, similar to Qt Jambi?
(between Qt and Java)
_
= You want FREE web-based email ?
= You want your own
Title: Start and call into mono VM from C/C++ ?
I would like to call into the mono VM from a C/C++ program.
I searched the mono site and google, and found only a technique to call C/C++ from C#.
I want to do the reverse. Something like:
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
create mono VM
2006/10/27, big one [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sun Microsystem plan to open the source of Java core in the next 30-60 days. Is it possible to create interface between Mono and Java, similar to Qt Jambi? (between Qt and Java)You can use some of the J2SE features with J#.
There is (of course) IVKM:
http://www.ikvm.net/
On Monday 30 October 2006 09:07, Olexandr Melnyk wrote:
2006/10/27, big one [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sun Microsystem plan to open the source of Java core in the next 30-60
days. Is it possible to create interface between Mono and Java, similar
to
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 10:28 +0200, Goldstein, Nachum (Jonathan) wrote:
I would like to call into the mono VM from a C/C++ program.
I searched the mono site and google, and found only a technique to
call C/C++ from C#.
I want to do the reverse. Something like:
int main(int argc, char**
Hi,
This is related to bug 79708.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79708
Does anyone have a clue why commenting out the line...
export PATH=$d/../lib/gtk-sharp-2.0:path
in...
/usr/bin/gapi2-parser
allows parsing to successfully complete with the gapi2-parser command?
Uncommenting the
It looks like Mono can't find its machine.config.
How do you invoke mono.exe?
I use shortcut icon in quick launch. Target is
C:\Program Files\Mono-1.1.17.1\bin\mono.exe
i:\mydir\myapp\myapp\bin\debug\myapp.exe
Assure that the run directory of the shortcut is
C:\Program
On 10/29/06 Goldstein, Nachum (Jonathan) wrote:
Does anyone have step-by-step instructions on how to build a COM server
in mono, that can be installed on a Windows machine?
The current mono only supports using COM objects, not exposing managed
code as a COM server, AFAIK. Jonathan Chambers is
I know this is probably pretty far fetched, but is it possible to statically
link an exe to all it's (non-mono) dll dependants?
What I'd like to do is run something like make deploy that collects all
dependants so I only have to deploy a single exe file.
If this doesn't exist, how would one go
As lupus said, I am working in this area right now and cleaning up a patch. However, what I currently have does not support exactly what you are describing. If you run a managed app or host the mono runtime you will be able to expose managed objects to unmanaged code as a COM object.
However, I
Carlos Adriano Portes escribió:
I would like to know where I could get some material for me to learn
ASP.NET, I am learning C# in order to be able to build applications
with only the compiler and a editor, so I would like to learn ASP.NET
to use with my linux as well!
I know HTML and think
By 'hosting mono' do you mean embedding it in a C/C++ COM
server?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
ChambersSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 16:57To:
mono-list@lists.ximian.comSubject: Re: [Mono-list] C# COM server in
mono?
As lupus said, I am working in
I meant this: http://www.mono-project.com/Embedding_MonoOn 10/30/06, Goldstein, Nachum (Jonathan)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By 'hosting mono' do you mean embedding it in a C/C++ COM
server?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon
ChambersSent: Monday, October
While not strictly static linking, I think mkbundle will do what you need:
http://www.mono-project.com/Guide:Running_Mono_Applications#Bundles_.28Linux_only.29
A real linker would need to do the static analysis on the assemblies
to remove unused code, but this some caveats in mono/.NET since
Colin JN Breame wrote:
I know this is probably pretty far fetched, but is it possible to statically
link an exe to all it's (non-mono) dll dependants?
Haven't used it personally, but this sounds like what you're looking for:
Hello,
It's failing because monodoc is trying to invoke chmod(2), which doesn't
exist on windows (except through cygwin.dll, but that doesn't count).
The obvious answer is that monodoc is not currently portable to Windows.
I don't know how much work it would take to make it portable.
Hello,
I've downloaded the 1.1.18.zip file for mono-basic and have looked
inside the archive and cannot find any logical way to build mono-basic
under Linux.
Today it is only possible to build this on Windows, as the vbnc compiler
is not self-hosting on Linux (missing features or bugs in
FYI - changing baseurl to the following worked - thanks to David Ford
for the info :)
[mono]
name=Mono for fedora-5-i386 (latest)
baseurl=http://go-mono.com/download-stable/fedora-5-i386/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
Glen Ford wrote:
Does anyone know if the yum repository for fedora-5
Has anyone else found the following in a SOAP Service, in returning
an array of objects in a SOAP Response I can see that output is being
interrupted by 'Target of Invocation Error'
As below ...
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:38:21 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.54 (Linux/SUSE)
Content-Length: 1413
[MonoTODO(Help out Windows developers)]
I was fortunate enough to speak with several Windows developers at the
Mono Summit about their experiences using Mono coming from a Windows
background, and what needs to be done to make it better.
Covering the 80/20 case, I think the following
Hey,
Nice resume.
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 20:08 -0600, Jonathan Pobst wrote:
...
- Mono Not Supported / Implemented rules
Another great idea I heard was creating something to analyze assemblies
for things that are not supported in Mono yet. Most likely this would
be a part of Gendarme
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 14:51 +, Colin JN Breame wrote:
I know this is probably pretty far fetched, but is it possible to statically
link an exe to all it's (non-mono) dll dependants?
What I'd like to do is run something like make deploy that collects all
dependants so I only have to
Since the idea of a managed operating system has been discussed at
length on the mono-devel-list, I went ahead and registered sharpos.org!
I encourage anyone interested in developing a managed operating system
to visit http://sharpos.org
Please start editing the wiki and sign up for the
Michael Schurter ha scritto:
Since the idea of a managed operating system has been discussed at
length on the mono-devel-list, I went ahead and registered sharpos.org!
I encourage anyone interested in developing a managed operating system
to visit http://sharpos.org
Please start editing
64 matches
Mail list logo
