Re: [Mono-list] Mono and .Net Floating Point Inconsistencies

2009-01-17 Thread Robert Jordan
ddambro wrote: > Hi, > > I was fairly sure the code had executed. As I mentioned, different flags in > the C code caused errors in the program. Just to be sure though, I threw in > some fprintf statements to stderr into setFloats() and they printed > properly, so the code was definitely executed

[Mono-list] asp:calendar Events missed?

2009-01-17 Thread Daniel Soto
Hi List. I need help, i'm using the calendar control, which defined as following: The OnVisibleChanged and OnDayRender are defined as protected void Calendar1_VisibleMonthChanged(System.Object sender, System.Web.UI.WebControls.MonthChangedEventArgs e) { fecha_mes_actual = Calendar1.Visibl

Re: [Mono-list] Mono and .Net Floating Point Inconsistencies

2009-01-17 Thread ddambro
Hi, I was fairly sure the code had executed. As I mentioned, different flags in the C code caused errors in the program. Just to be sure though, I threw in some fprintf statements to stderr into setFloats() and they printed properly, so the code was definitely executed. Thankfully I have been

Re: [Mono-list] Mono and .Net Floating Point Inconsistencies

2009-01-17 Thread Kornél Pál
Hi, DLLs are Windows specific are you sure you actually executed setFloats() on Linux? If you are unable to solve this issue using control flags we can't figure out what your problem is without providing us a test case that exhibits this behavior. Please create a source code (can be as smal

Re: [Mono-list] Mono and .Net Floating Point Inconsistencies

2009-01-17 Thread ddambro
I tried the FPU flags as follows: 1.Compiled the following file to a dll using gcc on a test linux system: #include void setFloats() { fpu_control_t desired = _FPU_MASK_DM | _FPU_MASK_UM | _FPU_MASK_PM |_FPU_DOUBLE | _FPU_RC_NEAREST ; _FPU_SETCW( desired); } 2.Added the followin

Re: [Mono-list] C# Console on Windows

2009-01-17 Thread Dimitar Dobrev
I'm very sorry, I should've looked better. In the bin directory (C:\Program Files\Mono-2.2\bin) there are convenient *.bat files for both the csharp and gsharp consoles. Sandy Armstrong wrote: > > On 01/17/2009 12:56 PM, Dimitar Dobrev wrote: >> Hi all. I just installed Mono 2.2 for Windows and

[Mono-list] Re commend PC104 Mono compatible SBC

2009-01-17 Thread ERobishaw
Can anyone recommend a PC104 form factor SBC that they've run Mono on? It needs to be industrial (handle at-least 70C temperature). I've had good success with the Embedded Arm TS7800, but I'm looking for a lower cost alternative, something around the $125 price range. Thanks Eric -- View this

Re: [Mono-list] C# Console on Windows

2009-01-17 Thread Sandy Armstrong
On 01/17/2009 12:56 PM, Dimitar Dobrev wrote: > Hi all. I just installed Mono 2.2 for Windows and wanted to use the > interactive C# console (the C# evaluator). I tried both running csharp.exe > from the command line and using Mono.CSharp.dll in a custom application. > However, these both failed wi

[Mono-list] C# Console on Windows

2009-01-17 Thread Dimitar Dobrev
Hi all. I just installed Mono 2.2 for Windows and wanted to use the interactive C# console (the C# evaluator). I tried both running csharp.exe from the command line and using Mono.CSharp.dll in a custom application. However, these both failed with the following stack trace: System.ArgumentExcepti

Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.2 RPMs for Fedora 8

2009-01-17 Thread Paul
Hi, > Unfortunately, I cannot currently upgrade to fc10. Not a problem > Can you confirm that I can use/try the same f10's Mono 2.2 RPMs, for my fc8 > Linux systems. > If so, could you please post a direct link, URL, for the RPMs.repo Download? download.fedora.redhat.com is where the rpms live,

Re: [Mono-list] making an rpm

2009-01-17 Thread Petit Eric
2009/1/17 sojan : > > thanks for your comments. can you send a sample of making debian package I think yu ask to chris, right ? because MonoOSC have only SPEC (RPM) wizard :-) > > thanks in advance > > Chris Howie wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:08 AM, sojan wrote: >>> I had a program which

Re: [Mono-list] making an rpm

2009-01-17 Thread sojan
thanks for your comments. can you send a sample of making debian package thanks in advance Chris Howie wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:08 AM, sojan wrote: >> I had a program which executed successfully with mono. >> how can i make a setup or rpm package to install the program in the >> sy

Re: [Mono-list] Mono and .Net Floating Point Inconsistencies

2009-01-17 Thread Kornél Pál
Hi, Please try the FPU flags suggested John to see if that solves your problem, modifying the control flags could be added to x86 versions of Mono so you wouldn't have to modify them manually. Kornél ddambro wrote: > The code is compiled for x86 in Windows, and the problems I describe persist

Re: [Mono-list] Problem getting Mono debugger mdb working

2009-01-17 Thread Tobi
Tobi wrote: > I have a hard time debugging some Mono runtime errors and wanted to give > the Mono Debugger a try. > > I'm running the latest SVN version of Mono and the debugger installed to > /opt/mono-trunk on a Debian Lenny / AMD64. > > Even a with simple "Hello World", mdb causes a SIGSEGV a

Re: [Mono-list] making an rpm

2009-01-17 Thread Petit Eric
2009/1/17 Chris Howie : > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:08 AM, sojan wrote: >> I had a program which executed successfully with mono. >> how can i make a setup or rpm package to install the program in the system I have writted MonoOSC , a GUI to use OBS system, it have an SPEC file Wizard to help you

Re: [Mono-list] Qyoto project dead ?

2009-01-17 Thread Arno Rehn
On Saturday 17 January 2009 01:04:47 you wrote: > Sorry about off-topic, but I wonder if there is some documentation on > the web? I tried to find some, but with no luck. No, currently there isn't any documentation at all for Qyoto. We plan to have some in time for KDE 4.2. -- Arno Rehn a...@arn

Re: [Mono-list] Thanks to all for your replies, here's mine.

2009-01-17 Thread Alan McGovern
> > http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing > > (2) remove the pieces of code that were covered by those patents, and also > (3) find prior art that would render the patent useless. Just as long as you dont forget point 1: (1) work around the patent by using a different implementation techniq

Re: [Mono-list] Qyoto project dead ?

2009-01-17 Thread James Mansion
Arno Rehn wrote: > Well, it's under GPLv2+, as most of KDE is. But as Qt 4.5 will be available > under LGPL as well, we will probably add LGPL as another option. > Please do - I can't help thinking that small ISVs (and in-house devs) wanting to use LGPL or pay-for Qt will make a big difference