I've been following IronJS with some enthusiasm... runs fast, but incomplete.
Hoping to see some EcmaScript5 and E4X love out there at some point... E4X
in a DLR based JS would be incredibly awesome...
There's also a few non-DLR entries in the .Net space, but I'd prefer DLR myself.
On 3/4/201
Hello,
Here they are:
* Script for .NET (http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/ck/2010/02/23/p1175)
This seems to be the most complete.
* IronJS (http://github.com/fholm/IronJS)
New fresh effort
* Jint (http://jint.codeplex.com/ my bad, this one is not DLR-based, but an
interpreter)
In the mono-devel list, I noticed this bit of news
[Mono-dev] Removing Obsolete Code from Mono 2.8
* Drop Microsoft.JScript and `mjs'
> Microsoft abandoned JScript, our implementation was never complete, and
> DLR-based solutions (all 3 of them) offer better ECMAScript/Javascript
> compatibil
Hi,
Check r153004 on mono-patches:
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2010-March/167770.html
The message says the changes are in mcs/class/System.Runtime.Serialization:
http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc?view=revision&revision=153004
Also note that anonsvn won't sync with our com
Am 04.03.2010 11:40, schrieb Daniel Hughes:
> Recently banshee turned on opt in statistic gathering, the first set
> of results are in, and it turns out that the overwhelming majority of
> Banshee users run it on Ubuntu. This possibly unexpected result is
> causing the banshee team to rethink their
Recently banshee turned on opt in statistic gathering, the first set
of results are in, and it turns out that the overwhelming majority of
Banshee users run it on Ubuntu. This possibly unexpected result is
causing the banshee team to rethink their strategy regarding
deployment to Ubuntu. Including
My apologies Atsushi, where is your repository?
I can't find any update on the main mono svn repository.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/WCF-Empty-Array-Bug-tp1576794p1577875.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Sounds great, thanks :)
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/WCF-Empty-Array-Bug-tp1576794p1577866.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists
Actually I just made a quick fix in svn (r153004).
Atsushi Eno
On 2010/03/04 18:42, Atsushi Eno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that there is a case that an array does not work fine, but
> this stack trace is not the case. So let's please file a bug with
> runnable code. The error message often (we
It is not about BasicHttpBinding but about WSDL support, which was not
supported in 2.6.
Current trunk code should not run into that NIE code (as the new
implementation does not use SerializationMap.GetSchemaType() anymore).
I haven't examined, but current implementation should support
non-cont
Hello,
I noticed that there is a case that an array does not work fine, but
this stack trace is not the case. So let's please file a bug with
runnable code. The error message often (well, very often) doesn't give
enough information by itself, and it is the case.
Atsushi Eno
On 2010/03/04 1:1
11 matches
Mail list logo
