No, no.
It's "GTK# for .NET" which is at version 2.12.10, not "GTK#" for ".NET
2.12.10" (a .NET version which doesn't exist, anyway).
jimevt wrote:
>Wait a minute - if the GTK# is for .NET 2.12.10, does that mean that I
> my compilation should be targeting .NET 2.12.10?
--
View this message
For Crystal reports, no, but there's an alternative if you look around.
As for old Infragistics components... You didn't specify what type of
component (WinForms, ASP.NET...), but anyway, I guess not. Only one way to
find out: try it. Note that Infragistics announced Mono compatibility with
their A
Nope, that didn't do it either. When I tried to run it without 4.0
installed, it clearly told me that I needed to install .NET 4.0.
After I installed .NET 4.0, I got the same error.
Just to be sure, I uninstalled Gtk# for .NET 2.12.10 and re-installed;
same error.
Wait a minute
Hello Again,
I'm targeting 3.5 and both the development and target machines have 3.5
sp1 on them. I tried uninstalling 3.5 sp1 on the target machine, then
installing 3.5 - still no luck.
I thought that I might target an earlier .NET version, but I get errors
when I try to build the solutio
I recently got an Android tablet, and was thinking, since it can take a
hardware keyboard, that the one thing I would really want on it, is
MonoDevelop. I was wondering, with the tools to compile Mono applications on
Android, is MonoDevelop available for Android, or are there plans to make it
a
Hi Jim,
If you're targeting .NET 3.5 then installing .NET 4.0 wouldn't help
because they use different CLRs. Is .NET 3.5 installed on the target
machine? Is it possible that you require .NET3.5 sp1?
John
> I already sent this in an email reply to Ian, but didn't see it show up in
> the list.
I already sent this in an email reply to Ian, but didn't see it show up in
the list. Sorry if you get it twice! Also - the build process says it is
building a target for .NET 3.5. I see that the development machine has
.NET 4.0 but the target doesn't.I'm going to try installing .NET 4.0
On 09.08.2011 23:53, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:34 AM, mwessendorf wrote:
>> However I need to ensure this runs on the PCL (Portable Class Library)
>> and therefore the above implementation does not work, since Pluse() / Wait()
>> aren't supported in PCL
>
> Where can I fi
