[Mono-aspnet-list] Implement Streamed Parameter using webHttpBinding in Mono

0 down vote favorite share [g+] share [fb] share [tw] My Interface of WCF looks like *[OperationContract] [WebInvoke(Method = POST, UriTemplate = /PostSample)] string PostSampleMethod(System.IO.Stream data);* My Implementation looks like * public string

Re: [Mono-aspnet-list] Helping with development of FastCGI, mod_mono and xsp

I would also be interested in hearing any thoughts on FastCGI, mod_mono, Mono.WebServer, etc. I've gotten a mixed story from blogs and sites like serverfault, and much of the info may be out of date. Mainly, I think it would really help to have an up-to-date summary of where those components are

[Mono-dev] Latest link targeting old release

This page: http://www.mono-project.com/GtkSharp has a section called current source release, under which: gtk-sharp points to 2.12.10, but latest really is 2.12.11. Except the latest is only available on http://download.mono-project.com/sources/gtk-sharp212/ and not from ftp.gnome.org where the

[Mono-dev] Why is mono-tools 2.11 an empty package?

Starting with Mono 2.10.6, the list of sources (http://origin-download.mono-project.com/archive/2.10.6/sources/) list mono-tools version 2.11: http://origin-download.mono-project.com/sources/mono-tools/mono-tools-2.11.tar.bz2 This version fails to build for me: ./configure: line 3846:

Re: [Mono-dev] Help on the ASP.NET stack

Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui http://safknw.blogspot.com/ Peace is the Ultimate desire of mankind. On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Lorenzo Dematté lorenzo.dema...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, Since this is my first post, let me introduce myself. My name is Lorenzo Dematte', I live and work

Re: [Mono-dev] MonoDoc editor - GSoC 2012

Hey Rauf, Rather than a GUI toolkit, the idea is more to have a common framework that concrete GUI editor can use to implement most editing operation on documentation. For instance, you would have to implement a common overload edition-operation which will take the modification for one method

[Mono-dev] enabling LLVM / jit with embedded mono

I noticed an operation which completes in a fraction of a second when run from the command line with mono is taking many minutes when run as an embedded VM within a C-based app. It seems almost as if is running without any JIT. I attempted to provide the --llvm flag when configuring mono

[Mono-dev] (no subject)

-- Sent from my Android device. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Cross-compile mono to MIPS SOC w/CodeSourcery 3.93?

Thanks for the tips... After some additional futzing, I've gotten very close. Everything compiles, but native links fail with messages like librt.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format. I determined this is because the -Wl,-EL flags I specify for the compiles aren't being passed on to

Re: [Mono-list] Installing Mono 2.10.8 on RHEL 6.0

On 4/2/2012 11:28 AM, sa5webber wrote: Hi Gregory I totally believe you about this. I don't think the problem is just a hardware error. I eventually managed to install mono so I didn't go as far as figuring out how to attach gdb to the mono process. a debugger to the Well now because of

Re: [Mono-list] Problems embedding GTK#

I have exact the same problem.!!! -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Problems-embedding-GTK-tp3321821p4527544.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-list maillist -

[Mono-list] HttpWebResponse concurrency problems

Im having trouble with concurrent HttpWebRequests/Responses scaling in our Mono 2.10.2 environment (Apache2). These are server-side requests made out to a REST API. We are mimicking concurrent users by running these requests on separate threads and as the number of threads increases, the response

Re: [Mono-list] Linux - Mono - Image Files...?

On Mar 30, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Allen Copeland wrote: Just out of curiosity: does mono support .so-based images for CLI metadata? No, though there was some thinking in that direction many moons ago in the context of supporting mixed-mode assemblies: