It depends on what kind of wizard
Do you mean like Oz or Gandalf or Dumbledore?
For Oz, you should try one of the brick roads - i think yellow. I am
not sure happens with red.
For Gandalf - You will need white - grey has been out of development
for a while.
Lastly, Dumbledore, after a major
Hi,
ObservableCollection was moved from Windows.Base to System and
TypeForwardedTo and TypeForwardedFrom tags were added to the relevant source
code. ObservableCollection is serializable but when done on a Windows system
using .NET = 3 the serialized object will still contain the WindowsBase,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:19:55PM +, edward.harvey.mono wrote:
From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-
boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of imreolajos
Hi all!
SpeedTest.cs
http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/file/n4658877/SpeedTest.cs
Did you read that
Don't forget too, that process creation is very expensive on windows, .Net sort
of shortcuts this because it is deeply welded into windows.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:07:00AM +, Alan wrote:
The majority of the time in this benchmark is spent doing array bounds
checking. If you change it
Hi,
I'm working on a cross-platform (Windows-Linux) client-server application.
The server process will be installed on a Windows 2008 server machine and
the client process on a Ubuntu 12.04. All Windows code was developed with
Visual Studio 2010. I have developed a basic net layer (as a dll
Hello,
I have a class in my project that is a widget. I know I can use it in code
as a workaround but can I use it in axml as well? If so, how do I configure it?
Thanks,
Dimitar Dobrev
___
Mono-list maillist -
From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-
boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Andres G. Aragoneses
Edward, he's not comparing managed vs. unmanaged, but .NET vs Mono.
I made a few comments on managed vs unmanaged, and the bulk of my message was
.Net vs Mono. Read it
On Mar 11, 2013, at 8:07 AM, Dimitar Dobrev dpldob...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a class in my project that is a widget. I know I can use it in
code as a workaround but can I use it in axml as well? If so, how do I
configure it?
The monodroid list [0] or the forums [1] would be a better
On Mar 11, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Ian Norton
ian.norton-bad...@thales-esecurity.com wrote:
Don't forget too, that process creation is very expensive on windows, .Net
sort of shortcuts this because it is deeply welded into windows.
Not really. A process is a process. That's why the .NET team
I had already tried that but I kept getting Error 36 Error parsing
XML: unbound prefix .../Resources/layout/locationslayout.xml in Visual
Studio. I use Mono for Android 4.4.55.Any other ideas?
From: Jonathan Pryor jonpr...@vt.edu
To: Dimitar
On 11/03/13 13:21, edward.harvey.mono wrote:
From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-
boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Andres G. Aragoneses
Edward, he's not comparing managed vs. unmanaged, but .NET vs Mono.
I made a few comments on managed vs unmanaged, and the bulk
I've managed to fix it. Thanks for your help.
Dimitar
From: Jonathan Pryor jonpr...@vt.edu
To: Dimitar Dobrev dpldob...@yahoo.com
Cc: mono-list@lists.ximian.com mono-list@lists.ximian.com
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:53 PM
Subject: Re:
Jonathan,
I didn't build the mono runtime. I just took the installable Windows
distributable from the Mono Download page. Is that built with our without
LLVM support? (And if it's built without LLVM support, then why is the -llvm
option offered at all?...)
--
Imre
From: Jonathan Chambers
Edward,
If you want to do a performance comparison, you need to find a job that you
actually care about, and hardware that you actually care about, and test on
that.
This may surprise you, but this is a job I care about on a hardware I care
about. I have simplified it a lot, of course -
Alan,
This is NOT just a benchmark - my actual code looks similar to this, except it
does a lot more things inside the body of the do-while loop.
If you change it from a ListT to a T[], the time taken to execute the test
is about half.
I'm sure that's true (and I will try that), but what
Imre,
Mono can load llvm dynamically, and if it fails to do so it outputs to
stderr. I am 99% sure the packages for Windows are not built with LLVM
support. In that case I would hope you get some output to stderr when
running?
Thanks,
Jonathan
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Olajos, Imre
Nope, I get no errors whatsoever.
--
Imre
From: Jonathan Chambers [mailto:jonc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:31 AM
To: Olajos, Imre
Cc: mono-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Poor Mono performance
Imre,
Mono can load llvm dynamically, and if it fails to do so it
Alan,
So, I did try your suggestion and replaced Listint with int[]. It did improve
the performance of the code, but as I suspected, it also improved the
performance in .NET, so the relative performance difference between the two
CLIs is still 80-90%:
Windows .NET = 0.479 sec
Mono 3.0.6 with
I think this is important to address. The biggest grievance I have with
Mono (and that many I've spoken with have) is the poor performance. It
seems like most of this thread is just excusing away the poor performance,
but not trying to address it. It really is a problem.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:12:09PM +, Olajos, Imre wrote:
Edward,
If you want to do a performance comparison, you need to find a job that you
actually care about, and hardware that you actually care about, and test on
that.
This may surprise you, but this is a job I care about on
You running Mono on Windows?
You should take in account that Windows as a platform is not a priority,
because in this OS you can already run .NET through the Microsoft stack.
So it may be possible that you're hitting a performance bottleneck that
doesn't exist in Unix.
On 11/03/13 16:34,
On 11.03.2013 17:19, Olajos, Imre wrote:
Is there anything I can do that would bring their relative
performance difference closer to each other (e.g. below 20-25%)?
So you didn't find the well-hidden --make-me-as-fast-as-ms
switch, did you? :)
You're comparing MS' 64-bit runtime with a 32-bit
I played around a bit with this and also noticed a very substantial MS
versus MONO difference, some notes on this:
*The biggest performance difference here is not the mono vs. .NET but rather
how the program is written. Right now the bulk of the code on both Mono and
.NET is spent on the
Sorry, Brad (and future people reading a disjoint email trail). Somehow,
Evolution has lost the reply to my email below.
If you want to compile once and run in multiple locations then you might
be able to do the ./configure make once, copy the files around and
then do sudo make install. I've
Hi All,
I had a quick question I was hoping someone could answer about the always
emit callvirt instruction pattern. I had always understood that one of the
great advantages of C# over Java was, as Miguel put it on his blog about
porting Android from java, virtual methods were made opt-in,
On Mar 11, 2013, at 8:47 PM, Nigel Delaney nigel.dela...@outlook.com wrote:
However, I was surprised to learn when disassembling code that both Mono and
Microsoft seem to ignore this optimization, and emit all method calls as
callvirt instructions in IL regardless of whether or not they are
Hi,
I am baffled by a couple of bugs I noticed running Mono (embedded in R) on a
Linux box.
* Issues occur on a Debian64. Occurs with Mono 2.10.8 as well as when running
on a recompiled mono using the 3.0.5 tag.
* Annoyingly, the issue disappears if I try to diagnose by attaching to the
27 matches
Mail list logo
