Thanks for the reply. The following disclosure may not have anything to do
with explaining this but it highlights some inconsistency in .Net:
I know Mono is not exactly VS (well very close as Xamarin is now part of
Microsoft) but the following comparison is still valid and interesting:
VS2003, 200
There's no reason you should not use it if the errors you are seeing are
within the tolerance of floating point calculation limits. If you require
more accuracy then use double instead of float. If you require perfect
accuracy then you'll have to use a special type/library which provides more
accur
You could also google for discussions about adding 0.1 and/or 0.2 multiple
times. That has fun results in every language too, for example
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26120311/why-does-adding-0-1-multiple-times-remain-lossless
On 17 May 2016 at 13:23, Alan wrote:
> There's no reason you sh
> Does this mean one should not use C# when performing scientific
> calculations? The above information is interesting.
For financial calculations it is recommended to use System.Decimal
I don't know about scientific calculations.
Timotheus
___
Mono-list
I wrote and tested the following C++ program after reading the Stack
Overflow article ,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31747247/change-real-process-name-in-c-on-linux
.
I discovered my program could not programatically change the Ubuntu 16.04
System Monitor
process name from cli or mono to