Compiling 2.4 from source is easy on Ubuntu, unlike 2.2 which I never did get
working.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Will-Mono-2.4-have-an-installer-for-Ubuntu--tp22541444p23443421.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sebastien Pouliot-2 wrote:
makecert generates its own, 1024 bits, keypair if you did not supply a
private key as an argument, i.e. -sv private.pvk where the file
already exists.
Thanks. What do you use to generate the pvk files then?
--
View this message in context:
The makecert utility creates a 1024 bits RSA key pair. What can I use to
generate a different sized key?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/makecert-tp23437870p23437870.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have just compiled mono 2.4 on Ubuntu, with no problems. Fantastic. Well
done mono.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Debian-support-tp22659654p22802257.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
I have a console app, I am developing in Visual Studio for windows and Linux.
Is there any good reason why I should recompile using the mono compiler
before deployment for Linux, or am I ok just using the windows one?
--
View this message in context:
Ok, thanks. And what if I compile on 32-bit windows and run it on 64-bit
Linux?
Stifu wrote:
There should be no need to recompile. If the .NET exe works fine with
Mono, then leave it as is.
--
View this message in context:
My hosting provider dont support OpenSuSE; just Debian and Redhat.
I'm happy to use Debian, but mono support seems to be somewhat behind. 2.4
is just around the corner, and Debian is still on 2.01. Whats the status of
Debian and Mono? My experience of getting Mono 2.2 on Unbuntu is not a
