RE: [Mono-list] Want to write tests

2003-01-25 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Andre | Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 7:59 AM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Cc: Jean-Marc Andre | Subject: [Mono-list] Want to write tests | | | Hi, | | as I said, I'd like to write tests as

RE: [Mono-list] Unit Tests & run_test.sh

2003-01-26 Thread Nick Drochak
| I noticed the script called run_test.sh. Thinking this is what I want, | I try it: That was for NUnit v1. We are now using version 2 for corlib tests (and soon for the others as well). | so I know the tests are running. I see there's a different | nunit-console in the script. | Is this scri

[Mono-list] System.XML.Xpath

2003-02-04 Thread Nick Drochak
Piers, Your recent patch for Xpath (Parser.cs and Parser.jay) has a reference to a Test.* namespace. This causes my build to stop with an error there on cygwin. Is that line supposed to be there, or is it maybe old debug stuff? Nick D. ___ Mono-list

[Mono-list] Patch for Registry

2003-02-04 Thread Nick Drochak
All, According to the class status page, Registry needs the following patch (see below). Ok to commit? Nick D. Index: class/corlib/Microsoft.Win32/Registry.cs === RCS file: /cvs/public/mcs/class/corlib/Microsoft.Win32/Registry.cs,v

RE: [Mono-list] MCS build failure

2003-02-04 Thread Nick Drochak
mcs --target exe @list -o ilasm.exe | make[2]: *** [ilasm.exe] Error 255 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/mcs/ilasm' | make[1]: *** [linux] Error 1 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Administrator/mcs' | make: *** [all] Error 2 IMHO, makefile on cygwin should use csc to compile.

RE: [Mono-list] MCS build failure

2003-02-04 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: John BouAntoun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:25 PM | To: Nick Drochak | Subject: RE: [Mono-list] MCS build failure | | | But doesn't using csc sort of make the self hosting statement invalid? Perhaps I should have been

RE: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0

2003-02-07 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Koss | Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 5:28 PM | To: Steve Mentzer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0 | | mcs and mint work. I haven't gotten an answer to my

RE: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0

2003-02-09 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: Bob Koss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:50 PM | To: Nick Drochak; Steve Mentzer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0 | | | On 2/7/03 4:12 AM, "Nick Drochak" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0

2003-02-09 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Koss | Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:39 AM | To: Nick Drochak; 'Steve Mentzer'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0 | | | On 2/8/03 6:53

RE: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0

2003-02-09 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: Peter Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:15 PM | To: Nick Drochak | Cc: Bob Koss; 'Steve Mentzer'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: [Mono-list] Re: OS/X build error for glib-2.0 | | | On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 2

[Mono-list] make testcorlib

2003-02-11 Thread Nick Drochak
Hi, Just wanted to mention that I added a "testcorlib" target to the makefile(s) in the mcs module. Now you can do a 'make testcorlib' to run the unit tests for corlib only. It's a bit faster, and the results don't scroll up as the other tests run afterwards. Enjoy -- Nick D

[Mono-list] make testcorlib

2003-02-11 Thread Nick Drochak
Hi, Just wanted to mention that I added a "testcorlib" target to the makefile(s) in the mcs module. Now you can do a 'make testcorlib' to run the unit tests for corlib only. It's a bit faster, and the results don't scroll up as the other tests run afterwards. Enjoy -- Nick D

RE: [Mono-list] MarshalByRefObject and Activator NUnit v2.0 test classes

2003-02-12 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Andr | Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:17 AM | To: mono-list | Cc: Jean-Marc Andre | Subject: [Mono-list] MarshalByRefObject and Activator NUnit v2.0 | test classes | | | Hi, | | Here are 2

RE: [Mono-list] MarshalByRefObject and Activator NUnit v2.0 test classes

2003-02-13 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: Jean-Marc Andr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:19 AM | To: Nick Drochak; mono-list | Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MarshalByRefObject and Activator NUnit | v2.0 test classes | | | Hi, | | No, I don't get this error. I tested the

[Mono-list] mcs/class/doc/TemplateTest.cs corrupt

2003-02-16 Thread Nick Drochak
All, If you are updating from CVS, you may have an error in mcs/class/doc on TemplateTest.cs. If you get the error, just delete that file and update again. -- Nick D ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listi

[Mono-list] mcs/class/doc/TemplateTest.cs corrupt

2003-02-16 Thread Nick Drochak
All, If you are updating from CVS, you may have an error in mcs/class/doc on TemplateTest.cs. If you get the error, just delete that file and update again. -- Nick D ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listi

[Mono-list] bugs-list subject line suggestion

2003-02-17 Thread Nick Drochak
Hi. I'd like to suggest changing the subject line of the bugs-list to include the status of the bug. Usually I am scanning for resolved bugs to test out, etc. For my purposes I care less about the priority. Perhaps status can be added to the subject, or even replace the priority if that field i

Re: [Mono-list] bugs-list subject line suggestion

2003-02-18 Thread Nick Drochak
> The headers already contain product/component, status, priority, etc > info. It should be a simple task to filter and highlight > "X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED" messages. > Great idea. I'll do it that way. RESOLVED is green :) Thanks, Nick D ___

[Mono-list] Corlib unit tests running now

2003-02-25 Thread Nick Drochak
All, Just thought I would let everyone know the corlib unit tests are running on mono on linux pretty well now. Here's the result summary from my box: Tests run: 1186, Failures: 30 Only 30 Failures is not too bad. I'll be tracking down those and entering buzillas for the one's I can't fix. I

[Mono-list] Re: [Mono-hackers-list] Corlib unit tests running now

2003-02-25 Thread Nick Drochak
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 01:41, Martin Willemoes Hansen wrote: > I was wondering if there will be a stand alone release of NUnit2? Ie. > Will NUnit2 be split out of the mono release? It is available at www.nunit.org. We just include the sources in cvs to make it easier for people, plus we needed a s

RE: [Mono-list] Corlib unit tests running now

2003-02-25 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: Martin Willemoes Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:31 AM | To: Jean-Marc Andr | Cc: Nick Drochak; mono-list | Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Corlib unit tests running now | | | On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 19:32, Jean-Marc André wrote

RE: [Mono-list] Corlib unit tests running now

2003-02-26 Thread Nick Drochak
| -Original Message- | From: Jean-Marc Andr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:33 AM | To: Nick Drochak | Cc: mono-list; Jean-Marc Andre | Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Corlib unit tests running now | | One other thing. There is a bug in the System.ActivatorTest.cs

Re: [Mono-list] Re: [Mono-hackers-list] Corlib unit tests runningnow

2003-02-26 Thread Nick Drochak
> What is this hack? Is a bug report already filed for it? > Well, it doesn't really matter since latest nunit v2 from their cvs builds and runs fine on current mcs/mono. I'll check in the newest files from them into our cvs as soon as I can; probably tomorrow. Nick D. _