[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?

2003-10-12 Thread Rhys Weatherley
On Sunday 12 October 2003 12:11 pm, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > > And I suppose you would just turn over internal Ximian/Novell legal > > advice and developer discussions should I ask for it? Nice try to avoid > > the apology. > > Rhys, I am not the one making claims that `Windows.Forms has no paten

[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?

2003-10-12 Thread Rhys Weatherley
On Sunday 12 October 2003 09:58 am, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > If you did such a careful study with your lawyer, would you mind > publishing it so others can review it? And I suppose you would just turn over internal Ximian/Novell legal advice and developer discussions should I ask for it? Nice t

[Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Re: Collaboration on alternatives to the US-patent-endangered APIs?

2003-10-11 Thread Rhys Weatherley
On Sunday 12 October 2003 06:47 am, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > But being selective about what you consider to be > thin-wrapper, and what you don't is just an exercise in deception. That's out of line and you should apologise. It was based on a careful analysis of the API's and other similar API'