Interesting idea, but not necessarily in the way you meant it. The things you list are applications that happen to run on Mono, but they aren't really integral to Mono as a platform or runtime environment. It's hard to see the overall benefit of such a loose collection of applications (unless
Jacek Blaszczynski wrote:
3) Equivalent of WPF for future GUI requirements but cross platform -
I know Migual blog entries about Avalon but a Gtk sharp as an
alternative is really far too short of achieving anything impressive.
QT4 bindings to provide an alternative to WinForms and GTK# for
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or IDE or the debugger. We know about those.
Bill Seurer wrote:
The page on the Mono wiki web site to create new accounts appears to be
broken.
http://www.mono-project.com/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin
All you can do is to log into an existing account there, not create new
ones. I looked at the page source and there is just nothing
Hi Chris,
Nothing has changed in SVN for months, so unless ODE updates are sitting
in a private branch somewhere, I'd say the work hasn't been done yet.
Your contribution would probably be welcome were there an avenue to do
so. At the risk of drawing criticism from the maintainer(s) for asking
Yes, that would be great. No such list exists at the moment. This
would at least allow interested parties to communicate amongst
themselves, exchange patches and the like while the project sorts itself
out.
+1.
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
We can host a Tao list if people need them.
[This should have gone to the list earlier today. Note to self: check reply
addresses before sending]
Ok Lab wrote:
Upgrading to mono 1.1 on linux gets me much further through the build
process but it still fails. I noted that it tries to build against the
mono 1.0 framework and has no option
Judging from recent posts to some forums, Randy seems to be going through a
difficult period. Burnout, disillusion with project leadership, something else
- I don't know. Not my business. The last post I recall suggested he was
looking for someone to take over the project. In recent days,
