e problem is that Unix has no real support to catch stack overflow, i.e.
it is highly system specific. So we decided to do a Segmentation fault in
that case.
Anyways, it should be possible to detect simple cases at compile time - so
the c# compiler could emit a warning in that case.
- Dietmar
mising
> interpreter. It looks like switching from JIT to interp at
> runtime is possible since they
> share most data structures. Has anyone else tried to do thie before?
Why cant you work with the JIT?
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
*this, void **params, MonoObject
**exc)
So this is a way to call managed function with different signatures, using
an single API.
For more information take a look at mono/mono/metadata/marshal.c
- Dietmar
>
> I found that this mechanism is used for certain other
> functions too(so
henever I cross this "limit".
Do you have a test case?
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
ss to c and use it there for
> reading and writing data from/back to C#?
I never tried it, but I guess PInvoke should handle that without
problems. Just set LayoutKind.Sequential on the class and you can pass
it like a struct to native code.
- Dietmar
P/Invoke was used so I can check
> it out a bit?
I have some tests in mono/mono/tests/pinvoke*.cs
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 14:48, Jerome Laban wrote:
> Could someone test it and commit it
just committed.
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
to think about how best to integrate
> this in the JIT, since I'd like to have an optimization pass remove the
> calls if they are redundand.
Is that really needed? I thought a program should not depend on such
things.
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list
ain?
do you really need such functionality inside unmanaged code? I guess you
can also do that in managed code?
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
s
> executed in the same domain.
> I attach some sample code to demonstrate what I mean.
I am quite unsure if we will support such things. Cant you put that code
into a managed method?
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
fixed some bugs in the code
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 17:36, dietmar wrote:
> I want to implement self modifying tables with asp.net, but the attached
> examples does not work. Maybe someone can point me to the right
> solution?
>
> - Dietmar
Title: LinkButton as submit and c
I want to implement self modifying tables with asp.net, but the attached
examples does not work. Maybe someone can point me to the right
solution?
- Dietmar
Title: LinkButton as submit and command
<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
Title: LinkButton as submit and command
<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
((double)3.5));
Console.WriteLine (Math.Round((double)4.5));
Console.WriteLine (Math.Round((double)5.5));
}
}
Result is:
2
4
4
6
- Dietmar
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 09:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are the final files that I got. I think
ne list for Ximian
>secrets and
> confidential information about Mono. Already agreed to.
Again - you can use mono-list for that. For example I post all JIT
related things to mono-list. So whats the problem?
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
works for everyone. I
cant see what is stopping you. If you want contribute anything just do
it. But the current discussion looks like a waste of time.
- Dietmar
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
, be
> careful with the "tildes").
Do you have some test cases to test the behavior? We usually add simple
tests to mono/mono/tests. Such regression tests are really helpful and
makes sure that we stay compatible with the MS jit.
- Dietmar
___
No, it should still work - please can you try with 0.19?
- Dietmar
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 00:26, Colin Francis Branch wrote:
> I'm using Interop for a NET port of SDL and I have it working in linux
> using mono .16 but I get a marshaling error when I try and run it with
> mon
17 matches
Mail list logo
