[Mono-list] ASP.net and Licensing

2014-11-20 Thread aleksit
Hey What is licensing terms of ASP.net of mono ? Is they same than licenses of mono ? Can I do commercial software with it and if I can what kind of things I need to add with my project ? And what is the license terms if I host my project for customers ? Do I need to buy Xamarin license ? --

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.net and Licensing

2014-11-20 Thread William Ivanski
Great question, I would like to know that too. William Ivanski 2014-11-20 9:13 GMT-02:00 aleksit aleksi.tanska...@live.com: Hey What is licensing terms of ASP.net of mono ? Is they same than licenses of mono ? Can I do commercial software with it and if I can what kind of things I need to

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.net and Licensing

2014-11-20 Thread Martin Thwaites
Does this not cover it? https://github.com/mono/mono/blob/master/LICENSE (Note, I'm not a legal expert so if you're concerned in anyway, get you lawyer to look into it) You've got to look at the individual libraries you're using though. If they are Mono libraries, chances are they are MIT/X11,

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.net and Licensing

2014-11-20 Thread William Ivanski
I think Martin is right. Reading mono license, at first glance is possible to see that everybody can use mono to develop, build and host ASP.NET websites (WebForms or MVC) for commercial purposes. I already developed some ASP.NET applications and run then on mono for personal and freelance

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.net and Licensing

2014-11-20 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list- boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of aleksit Hey What is licensing terms of ASP.net of mono ? Is they same than licenses of mono ? Can I do commercial software with it and if I can what kind of things I need to add with my

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-08-07 Thread Massimiliano Mantione
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 01:19 +0200, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: So I guess these frameworks would be affected if the ASP.NET API became patent-tied...? :-( Of course! Like any non trivial piece of software depending on any non trivial API, ASP.NET already *is* patent-tied, there's no

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-08-07 Thread Robert Jordan
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] escribió: Robert Jordan escribió: Hey, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: einKI.ml escribió: If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you but note that the fact that there is a

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-08-06 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
Robert Jordan escribió: Hey, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: einKI.ml escribió: If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of them (i.e. Microsoft .NET Framewrok) doesn't mean

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-08-06 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] escribió: Robert Jordan escribió: Hey, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: einKI.ml escribió: If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of them

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-28 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
einKI.ml escribió: If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of them (i.e. Microsoft .NET Framewrok) doesn't mean that you should avoid their open source implementations (i.e. Mono or

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-28 Thread Robert Jordan
Hey, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: einKI.ml escribió: If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of them (i.e. Microsoft .NET Framewrok) doesn't mean that you should avoid their

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-28 Thread Scott Williams
Please pardon my ignorance, but could someone elaborate on what is controversial about System.Web? ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-28 Thread Robert Jordan
Scott Williams wrote: Please pardon my ignorance, but could someone elaborate on what is controversial about System.Web? It's not part of the ECMA specs. http://mono-project.com/Licensing#Patents Robert ___ Mono-list maillist -

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-28 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, There are other frameworks that you can use without ASP.NET AFAIK, that Miguel has not mentioned (perhaps the ones he has mentioned are too tied to the AJAX-thing, I mean, they require JavaScript): Thanks for the pointers, I have updated the FAQ:

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-27 Thread Kornél Pál
or Mono.WebServer that are platform independent so can be used on MS.NET as well. Kornél - Original Message - From: einKI.ml [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mono-list mono-list@lists.ximian.com Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 7:25 PM Subject: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing Hi In the mono

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-27 Thread einKI.ml
Hi If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of them (i.e. Microsoft .NET Framewrok) doesn't mean that you should avoid their open source implementations (i.e. Mono or Portable.NET, IMHO

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-27 Thread Alex Nedelcu
ASP.NET is quite a controversial piece of the .NET framework. ADO.NET is another controversial library, that has no replacement. As Thomas Jefferson said ... the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Why can't we just stick with the ECMA standards and create true open-source alternatives for the

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-27 Thread Michael Schurter
Alex Nedelcu wrote: ASP.NET is quite a controversial piece of the .NET framework. ADO.NET is another controversial library, that has no replacement. As Thomas Jefferson said ... the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Why can't we just stick with the ECMA standards and create true

Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-26 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, Another question which is not related to the question above. Does anybody know a dtd file for ASP.NET to use it in my favorite html/xml editor? Good timing for this question. There is not a direct replacement for ASP.NET, but I think that there is a window of opportunity for something

[Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

2006-07-22 Thread einKI.ml
Hi In the mono (licensing) FAQ there is stated that The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono platform, nor integration with