I agree with Peter, it is Apache+mod_mono or XSP.
But i think XSP is more than a test server, i use it as a "real life"
web server, it is stable.
Regards
Johann
peter a écrit :
As such, are there any features you know of that are simply not
accessible from
a pure Apache+XSP scenario?
As such, are there any features you know of that are simply not
accessible from
a pure Apache+XSP scenario?
Sorry for butting in, but shouldn't it be Apache + mod_mono? I thought
XSP was just a minimal web server for test purposes only. Or have a got
hold of the wrong end of the stick (a
Quoting Johann BLAIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Matthew,
I think it would be easier if you exposed what are your concerns,
instead of asking what could be a problem with mono.
I have no concerns, I know that Apache + XSP + Mono does everything we need it
to. But my bosses (who despite not wanti
Hi Matthew,
I think it would be easier if you exposed what are your concerns,
instead of asking what could be a problem with mono.
Johann.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I'm wondering what features (if any) might be missing by combining XSP & Apache
together to host ASP.NET on non-Windows envi
I'm wondering what features (if any) might be missing by combining XSP & Apache
together to host ASP.NET on non-Windows environments? Are there any features
that simply cannot be performed within pure ASP.NET as a result of not being on
Windows?
I'm asking because the company I work for is looking