Re: [Mono-list] Apache + XSP | What might be missing?

2005-10-27 Thread Johann BLAIS
I agree with Peter, it is Apache+mod_mono or XSP. But i think XSP is more than a test server, i use it as a "real life" web server, it is stable. Regards Johann peter a écrit : As such, are there any features you know of that are simply not accessible from a pure Apache+XSP scenario?

Re: [Mono-list] Apache + XSP | What might be missing?

2005-10-27 Thread peter
As such, are there any features you know of that are simply not accessible from a pure Apache+XSP scenario? Sorry for butting in, but shouldn't it be Apache + mod_mono? I thought XSP was just a minimal web server for test purposes only. Or have a got hold of the wrong end of the stick (a

Re: [Mono-list] Apache + XSP | What might be missing?

2005-10-27 Thread met
Quoting Johann BLAIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Matthew, I think it would be easier if you exposed what are your concerns, instead of asking what could be a problem with mono. I have no concerns, I know that Apache + XSP + Mono does everything we need it to. But my bosses (who despite not wanti

Re: [Mono-list] Apache + XSP | What might be missing?

2005-10-27 Thread Johann BLAIS
Hi Matthew, I think it would be easier if you exposed what are your concerns, instead of asking what could be a problem with mono. Johann. [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I'm wondering what features (if any) might be missing by combining XSP & Apache together to host ASP.NET on non-Windows envi

[Mono-list] Apache + XSP | What might be missing?

2005-10-27 Thread met
I'm wondering what features (if any) might be missing by combining XSP & Apache together to host ASP.NET on non-Windows environments? Are there any features that simply cannot be performed within pure ASP.NET as a result of not being on Windows? I'm asking because the company I work for is looking