On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 05:42 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Murphy wrote:
but for that to
really work the developers working with (not on) Mono need to be
convinced to use the stable release and stop tracking the development
ones.
That's a question that really interests me!
But how
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 15:13 +, Dave Murphy wrote:
On 11/01/06, Jonathan Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something implied by better tools to develop software is more
productive developers. Mono *does* do this, as is seen with F-Spot, an
imaging application written entirely by one
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 22:53 +, Dave Murphy wrote:
I came across this quote from Miguel:
One of the reasons that we developed Mono was because we wanted to
have better tools to develop software – Miguel de Icaza
...and I was wondering: does Mono really provide a better environment
for
On 11/01/06, Jonathan Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consequently, reliance on distributions is a good thing -- you get the
entire package dependency tracking update mechanism for free.
I'd go for that if you could rely on the distributions to be
up-to-date, but for example Ubuntu Breezy is on
On 11/01/06, Jonathan Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something implied by better tools to develop software is more
productive developers. Mono *does* do this, as is seen with F-Spot, an
imaging application written entirely by one person, never mind all the
other useful Gtk# apps that have
Dave Murphy wrote:
...
but for that to
really work the developers working with (not on) Mono need to be
convinced to use the stable release and stop tracking the development
ones.
Cheers,
--
Dave Murphy (Schwuk)
http://schwuk.com
___
Mono-list
I came across this quote from Miguel:
One of the reasons that we developed Mono was because we wanted to
have better tools to develop software – Miguel de Icaza
...and I was wondering: does Mono really provide a better environment
for developers?
I don't want to get into a debate about language
