Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
He has to pass --with-sigaltstack=no --with-nptl=no if he's running a
2.6.x kernel in the machine that builds the packages.
For those following along at home, this is now Debian Bug#243940.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=243940
Thanks,
Stuart.
--
S
El jue, 15-04-2004 a las 16:25, Stuart Ballard escribió:
> Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
> > It worked for me using --with-nptl=no --with-sigaltstack=no and kernel
> > 2.4.25, but when I turned sigaltstack on, it failed as it fails for
> > Stuart. The backtrace took me to code in libpthread and li
Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
It worked for me using --with-nptl=no --with-sigaltstack=no and kernel
2.4.25, but when I turned sigaltstack on, it failed as it fails for
Stuart. The backtrace took me to code in libpthread and libgcc :-?
Should I file a bug report with the debian maintainers about t
El mar, 13-04-2004 a las 20:44, David Sheldon escribió:
> I think that this is bug 55253.
>
> http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
>
> Are the debian packages compiled with the --with-sigaltstack=no
> option?
>
> Hmm, I wonder if this works for anyone else. It definitely doesn't w
t;Stuart Ballard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "mono-list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:19 PM
> Subject: [Mono-list] Mono 0.31 segfault
>
>
> > Running mono 0.31 from debian packages. The following simple test
> > program
t: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:19 PM
Subject: [Mono-list] Mono 0.31 segfault
> Running mono 0.31 from debian packages. The following simple test
> program crashes mono with a segmentation fault:
>
> public class MainClass {
> public static void Main() {
> object o = null;
> Con
Running mono 0.31 from debian packages. The following simple test
program crashes mono with a segmentation fault:
public class MainClass {
public static void Main() {
object o = null;
Console.WriteLine(o.ToString());
}
}
I'd expect to get a NullRefe